from our secure web server. Has anyone successfully configured
Tomcat-IIS that is using a secure web server?
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 6:30 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Hansel, Jason T
the
application is not even being seen as a valid URL when trying to hit on port
8009, eventhough it's listening.
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 2:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Just
]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Chuck,
I was able to get everything working on my end. There is a *significant*
performance decrease when running my application through IIS and Tomcat
using the isapi_redirect.dll, as opposed to port 8080.
No way to know what you mean by
this
with the isapi_redirect.dll
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Charles,
I was just putting
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Would it be better to install the 32-bit if our IIS
is running as 32-bit?
Other than the optional APR connector and service wrapper, Tomcat is pure Java
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Would it be better to install the 32-bit if our IIS is running as
32-bit?
Other than
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
I am going to install version 6.0.18
Much better to use 6.0.29 - stay current.
are there preferred versions of JVM you recommend
6u21b07 (the latest) seems
List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
I am going to install version 6.0.18
Much better to use 6.0.29 - stay current.
are there preferred versions
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well I'd like to but 6.0.18 is the most recent version
approved on our network.
You might want the powers that be to review the fixes that have gone in over
6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well I'd like to but 6.0.18 is the most recent version approved on our
network.
You might want the powers that be to review the fixes
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!!
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:40 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!!
There was one regression in 6.0.28 that you should be aware of:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla
Alright!
-Original Message-
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:45 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO
Chuck,
Besides the latest version, is there one that you recommend?
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR
Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Besides the latest version, is there one that you recommend?
Not really. Many other fixes are in 6.0.28; whether or not the one regression
is important
Cool, thanks Chuck. I need to provide justification to the powers that be.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 12:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR
AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Well good news, 6.0.28 was JUST approved...WooHOO!!!
There was one regression in 6.0.28 that you
:12:52.389 2010] [10216:8452] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (3010):
recycling connection pool slot=0 for worker worker1
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:13 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
See
See inline
On 05.08.2010 15:15, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Rainer,
Thanks again for being patient with me. I've seen some different behavior
this morning. When I am trying to access my page, I get Service Temporary
Unavailable, which is better than what I was
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Rainer,
Thanks again for being patient with me. I've seen some different behavior
this morning. When I am trying to access my page, I get Service Temporary
Unavailable, which is better than what I was receiving.
Yes, that looks good, from
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Tomcat is not listening on Port 8009 using the AJP/1.3 protocol.
I can change this line of code (just did it as a test) to reference port
8009 and I can see it's listening, however this Is not the protocol I am
wanting.
Connector
defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=jvm1
--
Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:44 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
Hansel, Jason T CTR
From: Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
[mailto:jason.t.hansel@navy.mil]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
I created a folder within the Tomcat 6.0 directory called
'connector'. That is where all of my redirect files are
locared.
For curiosity's sake, what
: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
See inline
On 05.08.2010 15:15, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Rainer,
Thanks again for being patient with me. I've seen some
(which I
was referring to below as the redirect file...sorry my in head language)
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
From: Hansel, Jason
Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Charles,
I was just putting that protocol in there to prevent the 8080 from being
hit, I've actually commented it out. I got this server.xml file from the
install (Note:that not everything is on here). I can load my webapp now, but
the page
Maybe to avoid further meandering in what should or should not work, here is a short
tutorial of how all this stuff works.
At the end of the chain, you have a Tomcat Engine. This engine processes HTTP requests
which it receives in some internal Tomcat format. The requests are processed by
I am trying to get Tomcat and IIS configured on my secure web server (SSL)
so that I can access my deployed web application via https and NOT over
http. Connection to non-SSL works, but I cannot have that connection due to
security.
I want to run Tomcat through IIS, and I have configured it using
On 04.08.2010 18:07, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
I am trying to get Tomcat and IIS configured on my secure web server
(SSL) so that I can access my deployed web application via https and NOT
over http. Connection to non-SSL works, but I cannot have that
connection
6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
On 04.08.2010 18:07, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
I am trying to get Tomcat and IIS configured on my secure web server
(SSL) so that I can access my deployed web application via https and
NOT over http. Connection to non-SSL works, but I cannot have
/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
On 04.08.2010 18:07, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
I am trying to get Tomcat and IIS configured on my secure web server
(SSL) so that I can access my deployed web application via https and
NOT over http. Connection to non-SSL works, but I cannot have
.host=127.0.0.1
worker.worker1.port=8009
Here is my uriworkermap.properties:
/geoportal|/*=worker1
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
On 04.08.2010
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
On 04.08.2010 20:58, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00 wrote:
Jung,
I'm still getting the errors.
Why
.
Regards,
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.18/ IIS 6.0 /SSL
On 04.08.2010 20:58, Hansel, Jason T CTR SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 55E00
wrote:
Jung,
I'm still
36 matches
Mail list logo
