Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mentioning WatchedResource is a red herring. reloadable attribute -> nothing to do with reloadable apps I disagree: "relodable ( attribute) Set to true if you want

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> Mentioning WatchedResource is a red herring. > > reloadable attribute -> nothing to do with reloadable apps I disagree: "relodable ( attribute) Set to true if you want Catalina to monitor classes in /WEB-INF

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:39 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Dan Beaulieu wrote: Well I guess this gets into the nuances of classloaders that I am completely unfamiliar with, but

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Dan Beaulieu
TECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:42 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server > startup with unpacked WAR > > Dan Beaulieu wrote: > >> Right, I understand the function of the reloadable attribute.

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Filip Not to mention, it doesn't really make sense when using an unpackable war. -Original Message- From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Dan Beaulieu
ip > Not to mention, it doesn't really make sense when using an unpackable war. > > -Original Message- > From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
riginal Message- From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR even then, you should set reloadable="false" th

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Dan Beaulieu
] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:26 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Right, I understand the function of the reloadable attribute. What I don't understand is how on a modern computer, r

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-24 Thread Dan Beaulieu
apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR even then, you should set reloadable="false" the flag name is misleading, all apps are reloadable, regardless of what that setting is (basically autoDeploy="true" -> webapps are reloadable) read up o

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
le shouldn't have that much of an impact. -Original Message- From: Len Popp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Is it unpacking the wa

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Dan Beaulieu
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Is it unpacking the war during startup? Unzipping 2000 files takes a while (even if they're small). -- Len

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Len Popp
w many classes are in WEB-INF/classes. Start up time is now around > 5s instead of 80s. > > -Original Message- > From: Dan Beaulieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 10:32 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: Tomcat6, apache2, mo

Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
st 23, 2007 10:32 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Hello, we are having problems with slow server startup with Tomcat6. It is a basic webapp and the server starts up fairly quickly when WEB-INF e

RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Dan Beaulieu
x27;Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR Hello, we are having problems with slow server startup with Tomcat6. It is a basic webapp and the server starts up fairly quickly when WEB-INF exists, but if we are trying t

Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server startup with unpacked WAR

2007-08-23 Thread Dan Beaulieu
Hello, we are having problems with slow server startup with Tomcat6. It is a basic webapp and the server starts up fairly quickly when WEB-INF exists, but if we are trying to deploy from a WAR, it takes 10 times as long. I've downloaded the tomcat source to try to dig in and see what is going on,