I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any
more time trying to get this configured, I would like to know what is
the best way to proceed: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp?
Thanks,
Brad
On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote:
Jess,
Thanks for the reply.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why
use mod_jk?)
I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any
more time trying to get this configured, I would like to know
what
is the
way to
go.
,
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why
use mod_jk?)
I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I
Message-
From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:14 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was:
why use mod_jk?)
Josh,
Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my
next question
* Brad O'Hearne wrote (24/02/06 15:14):
Josh,
Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my
next question. Bill Barker suggested the httpd.conf / mod_proxy_ajp
directive side of the equation. Doesn't there have to be a connector
in tomcat's server.xml which will
