Re: mod_jk replacement?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raj, Raj Mettai wrote: > how to put wildcards into ProxyPass, for example if I want to send > only jsp requests to tomcat and not html like below. > > ProxyPass /*.jsp ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/ > > the above config is not working, I have jsp files spr

Re: mod_jk replacement?

ure [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/22/2007 4:14:54 AM >>> Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. I don't have this in an production environment, but along this week I plan to do it. This is an extract of my apache config: ProxyPass /app/img/ ! Pro

RE: mod_jk replacement?

upon request. Therefore, this email communication may be subject to public disclosure >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/22/2007 4:14:54 AM >>> Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. I don't have this in an production environment, but along this

Re: [OT] mod_jk replacement?

'll be away for two days, so don't expect an answer before friday. >> >> Thank you very much, I can upload the mod_jk.log tomorrow after the new >> test with the updated settings and let you know on Friday. >> >> J.Neuhoff >&

Re: [OT] mod_jk replacement?

wer before friday. > > Thank you very much, I can upload the mod_jk.log tomorrow after the new > test with the updated settings and let you know on Friday. > > J.Neuhoff > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--t

Re: mod_jk replacement?

JNeuhoff wrote: The same here. Most of the static content (such as *.png) is being served by the Apache frontend, and only requests for to our web service are configured with the ProxPass directives. I had to use the ProxyPassReverse, too: ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass /ohpr/ http://localhost:8

RE: mod_jk replacement?

e serves this kind of content, I'm reducind the > tomcat's load in 90%. > > -Mensaje original- > De: JNeuhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: jueves, 25 de enero de 2007 14:38 > Para: users@tomcat.apache.org > Asunto: RE: mod_jk replacement? >

RE: mod_jk replacement?

:38 Para: users@tomcat.apache.org Asunto: RE: mod_jk replacement? I just tried it with the mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http modules which are indeed available for Apache 2.0.59, and it works fine connecting to backend Tomcat web service using the http protocol and port 8080. I only needed one l

RE: mod_jk replacement?

, 22 de enero de 2007 16:55 > Para: Tomcat Users List > Asunto: Re: mod_jk replacement? > > On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. > > The OP asked about Apache ht

Re: mod_jk replacement?

ly remaining problem. Does it imply a problem on >>> the user side? >> >> I had our sysadmin check the hardware and network equipment today, and he >> also examined the Windows 2003 event logs. He couldn't find anything >> abnormal. >> >> J.N

Re: mod_jk replacement?

for two days, so don't expect an answer before friday. Thank you very much, I can upload the mod_jk.log tomorrow after the new test with the updated settings and let you know on Friday. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#

Re: mod_jk replacement?

JNeuhoff schrieb: >> connection timeout on mod_jk side is in seconds, on tomcat side is in >> milliseconds. So Mladens suggestion had a missing trailing 0 to make the >> params on the two sides fit. I think he meant connectionTimeout=60 >> to make it fit the 600 on the mod_jk side. > > Thanks,

Re: mod_jk replacement?

y remaining problem. Does it imply a problem on > the user side? I had our sysadmin check the hardware and network equipment today, and he also examined the Windows 2003 event logs. He couldn't find anything abnormal. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mo

Re: mod_jk replacement?

lue, that is, 250. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8529369 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: us

Re: mod_jk replacement?

OK, one small error or typo in communication: connection timeout on mod_jk side is in seconds, on tomcat side is in milliseconds. So Mladens suggestion had a missing trailing 0 to make the params on the two sides fit. I think he meant connectionTimeout=60 to make it fit the 600 on the mod_jk s

Re: mod_jk replacement?

JNeuhoff wrote: The web service still receives requests and responds normally, yet mod_jk now always comes up with this in its mod_jk.log: Increase the connection pool from 10 to 50 and see what happens. Regards, Mladen. - T

Re: mod_jk replacement?

lemate scenario, only a complete server reboot does it. J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8527029 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

RE: mod_jk replacement?

Para: Tomcat Users List Asunto: Re: mod_jk replacement? On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is not available (introduced i

Re: mod_jk replacement?

JNeuhoff wrote: Thank for your explanations. If any part closes this (AJP) connection you will observe 'memory leaak', meaning thread will stay open without the clue the other part closed the connection. Maybe I mis-understood the meaning of the timeout settings because I always thought that

Re: mod_jk replacement?

se Windows thinks that some or all of these connections don't exist anymore! Regards J.Neuhoff -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8513072 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: mod_jk replacement?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 J, JNeuhoff wrote: > Hmm, this might be a good reason to upgrade to Apache 2.2.x then. Currently, > the mod_jk 1.2.20 in conjunction with Apache 2.0.59 is not suitable for a > production system running Windows 2003, and unfortunately we don't have > s

Re: mod_jk replacement?

JNeuhoff wrote: Is there another connector software available ... http://www.nabble.com/Apache-mod_jk-memory-leak--tf3023318.html There are two major things why you can observe so called 'leak'. When connecting Apache Httpd and Tomcat via mod_jk the major thing you have to take into account is

Re: mod_jk replacement?

s the server OS. Has anybody been successfully running Apache 2.2.x with the mod_proxy_ajp on a production Windows 2003 server? J.Neuhoff Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote: > > On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Recently i'm using mod_proxy_

Re: mod_jk replacement?

On 1/22/07, David Rodríguez Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. The OP asked about Apache httpd 2.0.x, for which mod_proxy_ajp is not available (introduced in 2.2.x). And yes, I've used it successfully

RE: mod_jk replacement?

Recently i'm using mod_proxy_ajp, as mod_jk replacement with apache. I don't have this in an production environment, but along this week I plan to do it. This is an extract of my apache config: ProxyPass /app/img/ ! ProxyPass /app/js/ ! ProxyPass /app/doc/ ! ProxyPas

Re: mod_jk replacement?

On 1/21/07, JNeuhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can't help on the Windows/mod_jk issue because I haven't used either for quite some time but... Alternatively, we are thinking of running a standalone Tomcat in which case we'd find to find a way of mapping some web-enabled directories with static

mod_jk replacement?

with static resources (mainly PNG images and some simple PHP scripts) to Tomcat in addition to our Servlet. Is that possible? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html#a8481132 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabbl