Re: processing precedence for mod_jk config?

2009-09-02 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.08.2009 15:57, Christopher Schultz wrote: Is this due to the new version of mod_jk and that's just how it behaves, or because I have a very open mapping for the mount directives, or something else I'm just not seeing. I don't believe there have been significant changes to the way

Re: processing precedence for mod_jk config?

2009-08-26 Thread Chris Cheshire
The reason why I have the mount directives so open is because I am using Stripes with no prefix or suffix mappings on the actions (servlets). JSPs are handled internally (every page is served via an action), so the urls don't have a specific pattern (/servlet, /action, .do, etc) that can be

Re: processing precedence for mod_jk config?

2009-08-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris, On 8/26/2009 3:08 AM, Chris Cheshire wrote: The reason why I have the mount directives so open is because I am using Stripes with no prefix or suffix mappings on the actions (servlets). Gotcha. As for the differences in configuration

processing precedence for mod_jk config?

2009-08-25 Thread Chris Cheshire
Hi, I have been working on a web-app that has been running under tomcat 6 alone for a while. I am now configuring Apache to do some rewrite rules with domains and then forward on to tomcat, which is working. However, even with a directory deny rule in apache conf to block the web-inf and

Re: processing precedence for mod_jk config?

2009-08-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris, On 8/25/2009 9:37 PM, Chris Cheshire wrote: However, even with a directory deny rule in apache conf to block the web-inf and meta-inf directories, requests to it are still getting passed to tomcat. That's because they aren't being treated