No thread reuse

Hi! We are using TomEE 1.7.2 with message driven beans and ActiveMQ 5.11.1. In general there are about thirty threads that handles the message driven bean activities (JmsResourceAdapter-worker- - 1, ..., JmsResourceAdapter-worker- - 30). But from time to time we can see that every mdb execution

Re: No thread reuse

Hi did you set JmsResourceAdapter.MaximumPoolSize to something higher than 30 or JmsResourceAdapter to something = 0? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

RE: No thread reuse

Hi Romain! We increased the PoolMaxSize setting for the JmsConnectionFactory: Tomee.xml: [...] Resource id=JmsResourceAdapter type=ActiveMQResourceAdapter BrokerXmlConfig broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)?persistent=trueamp;useJmx=false ServerUrl =

Re: No thread reuse

Ok so this is not the same pool as the resource adapter one, resource adapter pool has a keep alive ( KeepAliveTime ) of 1 minute by default, this can explain it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github

RE: No thread reuse

Hi Romain! I know that a http thread is removed after a minute. So the same setting is used for mdb threads? Is there a way to increase the keepalivetime for mdb threads? Best regards, Thomas From: Romain Manni-Bucau [via TomEE OpenEJB]

Re: No thread reuse

JmsResourceAdapter.KeepAliveTime = 1 hour 0 should be tolerated as well (check ThreadPoolExecutor for more about it) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Problem with override getClasses() and getSingletons() in subclass javax.ws.rs.core.Application

Dear All, We use annotation scanning to discover Resouce classes defined in our application and override the getClasses() with it (we add self-defined annotation @DiscoerableResource to our Resource classes ). At meantime, we want to override getSingletons() to customize a JSON provider. Then

Re: Problem with override getClasses() and getSingletons() in subclass javax.ws.rs.core.Application

Hi did you log the resources you found when it fails? I guess you dont find the resources in the failling case. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Re: EJB Transaction Timeout

Worked like a charm! Thanks for helping! BTW aren't CMT terribly slow comparing to explicit BMT begin/rollback/commit ? 2015-08-04 10:35 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Try using a bean managed tx bean delegating to a container managed one. It would allow it easily. Le 4

Re: EJB Transaction Timeout

it uses the same code so tempted to say no without more inputs. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber

Humble stacktrace help

Hi guys, Just want to ask the forum since I've gotten an issue in which I'm not 100% sure whats going on. It's related to the message @SessionScoped does not exist within current thread but I have some more info. I've got to separate (but equal setup - same app, same tomee 1.7.2) in the

Re: Humble stacktrace help

hi what is cdi setup - distributed somehow, default, ... - and load balancer one - sticky, round robin, ...? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Re: Humble stacktrace help

Hi, relevant LB config (same in lab and production): BalancerMember ajp://10.215.144.4:8009 route=tomcat1 loadfactor=1 keepalive=On ttl=60 BalancerMember ajp://10.215.144.5:8009 route=tomcat2 loadfactor=1 keepalive=On ttl=60 and: RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto https ProxyPass /myApp/

Re: Humble stacktrace help

Without clustering of session, session scoped beans can be lost. Can explain what you have in prod with a different load surely. Le 5 août 2015 13:35, hwaastad he...@waastad.org a écrit : Hi, relevant LB config (same in lab and production): BalancerMember ajp://10.215.144.4:8009

Re: Problem with override getClasses() and getSingletons() in subclass javax.ws.rs.core.Application

Hi, Do you mind creating a small example to reproduce and share it on Github or so? Thanks JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Yun Jie Zhou yunj...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Dear All, We use annotation scanning

OpenEJB Rest Service - cxf null pointer

I'm trying to set up a simple proof of concept Rest service using a Stateless EJB bean deployed into OpenEJB. I'm using openejb 4.6.0.2 Aug 04, 2015 4:14:15 PM org.apache.openejb.server.SimpleServiceManager start INFO: Can't start service cxf-rs java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: OpenEJB Rest Service - cxf null pointer

This example https://github.com/sgjava/tomee-jaxrs-test uses JAX-RS to marshall a simple DTO and includes client timeouts. On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Temeraire a.p.ri...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to set up a simple proof of concept Rest service using a Stateless EJB bean deployed into

No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

When I had 1 or 2 web applications on 1 tomee instance (and default tomee ActiveMQ configuration), app1 - has MDBs, using ActiveMQ JMS - JAX RS (web) client to execute REST service on app2 app2 - has MDBs, using ActiveMQ JMS - REST service running, uses MDBs to execute business logic This works

Re: No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

Below, is what is in my tomee.xml for tomee 2nd instance, On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: For tomee 2nd instance, I changed server shutdown port, connector port, and add the following to tomee.xml: !-- Internal ActiveMQ Broker

Re: Problem with override getClasses() and getSingletons() in subclass javax.ws.rs.core.Application

Yes, you are correct. Didn't find any resources in the failing case. I found the annotation scanning didn't work properly as expected. I am debugging it. thanks. Thanks Best Regards Austin ( 周?杰/Yun Jie Zhou) z/OS System Test and Performance, China System Technology Lab Tel: 86-10-82452455

Re: Problem with override getClasses() and getSingletons() in subclass javax.ws.rs.core.Application (solved)

Thanks for your reply. I found a bug in the annotation scanning processing, I fixed it. Thanks Best Regards Austin ( 周?杰/Yun Jie Zhou) z/OS System Test and Performance, China System Technology Lab Tel: 86-10-82452455 Ext: 52455 Mobile: 13811310391 E-Mail: yunj...@cn.ibm.com From:

Re: No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

Surely cause not serialized Le 5 août 2015 14:40, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a écrit : Below, is what is in my tomee.xml for tomee 2nd instance, On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote: For tomee 2nd instance, I changed server

Re: OpenEJB Rest Service - cxf null pointer

Hi You should get a caused by no? Le 5 août 2015 11:38, Steve Goldsmith sgj...@gmail.com a écrit : This example https://github.com/sgjava/tomee-jaxrs-test uses JAX-RS to marshall a simple DTO and includes client timeouts. On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Temeraire a.p.ri...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

Okay, I just recognized that after searching internet, but I still wonder why the code below works when I have one tomee (activemq) instance. Prior to today, GoogleCalendarEvent did not need to implement Serializable. public void updateGoogleCalendar(ListGoogleCalendarEvent eventsToAdd)

Re: No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

Local transport can skip serialization in some cases Le 5 août 2015 15:57, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a écrit : Okay, I just recognized that after searching internet, but I still wonder why the code below works when I have one tomee (activemq) instance. Prior to today,

Re: No exception until attempt to use ActiveMQ on 2 separate tomee instances

Interesting, okay. On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Local transport can skip serialization in some cases Le 5 août 2015 15:57, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a écrit : Okay, I just recognized that after searching internet, but I