Re: Arquillian, TomEE 8.0.10, and JUnit5

Hi Daniel, there is a JUnit 5 / Arquillian example available [1]. The important thing (as far as I remember my past self 12 months ago) is, that we need to use a alpha version of arquillian for JUnit 5 support [2], i.e. >= 1.7.0.Alpha5 Gruß Richard [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/tom

Re: Apache TomEE 8.0.6 onwards is packaged with quartz-2.2.4.jar

2020, so our exclusions did not match. Gruß Richard Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 05:36 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi Patrick, > > could you create an issue https://issues.apache.org/ with this > finding? > This would help us track it (and it does not get lost in the

Re: Apache TomEE 8.0.6 onwards is packaged with quartz-2.2.4.jar

Hi Patrick, could you create an issue https://issues.apache.org/ with this finding? This would help us track it (and it does not get lost in the mailing list). Thanks in advance, Richard Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 12:55 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Thanks for reporting. > I don't th

Re: Apache TomEE version clarification

Richard OConnell: > Thanks for the response and follow up. > Can I take it that TomEE Webprofile 1.7.5 is EOL and unsupported? > Would it be possible for the website to be updated with this > information as it'll support decision making regarding version and > support? > >

Re: Apache TomEE version clarification

Hi, I forwarded this mail to the dev@ list to start a discussion regarding "maintained" and EOL versions of TomEE. I think, that the website is missing information regarding the status "eol" or "supported / maintained". Gruß Richard Am Donnerstag, dem 02.12.2021 um 14:25 + schrieb Richard O

Re: TomEE 8.0.9 release with fixed Tomcat >=9.0.54

(+ votes) over there. Gruss Richard Am Dienstag, dem 16.11.2021 um 09:32 +0100 schrieb Stefan Jakob: > Hi Richard, > > Am 15.11.21 um 18:50 schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > > I think, that we are currently waiting for the openwebbeans release > > to have Java 17 compatibility

AW: TomEE 8.0.9 release with fixed Tomcat >=9.0.54

I think, that we are currently waiting for the openwebbeans release to have Java 17 compatibility. Afaik, this ist the only blocker... Gruß Richard Von: Stefan Jakob Gesendet: Montag, 15. November 2021 17:18:56 An: users@tomee.apache.org Betreff: TomEE 8.0.9 rele

Re: tables from project are not created.

rsion} > org.javassist:javassist:${javassist.version} > com.fasterxml:classmate:${classmate.version} > antlr:antlr:${antlr.version} > dom4j:dom4j:${dom4j.version} > > > > true > true > - > > > false > > > > mauro.tomee7hibernate:prova

Re: tables from project are not created.

Hi Mauro, I had a quick look at your project. Any reason for choosing TomEE 7 / EE7? If not absolutly necessary, I would look at TomEE 8 in 2021. I made some changes and the project is working fine (see my PR in your project). The following adjustments are necessary / were made: 1. "org.hiberna

Re: Is the new TomEE version 8.0.8 certified on JDK 17 ?

I wouldn't call it "certified" ;) Am Mittwoch, dem 15.09.2021 um 08:33 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > Hello, > > So TomEE 8.0.8 is certified on JDK 16 but not yet on JDK 17: is this > correct ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message- > Fr

Re: Is the new TomEE version 8.0.8 certified on JDK 17 ?

No. It was discussed on the vote for 8.0.8 but should be a subject for 8.0.9 imho. We have a production system (simple JSF webapp + JAX-RS - nothing complicated) running with J16 for a few weeks now (before 8.0.8 - it was a custom 8.0.8-SNAPSHOT build...). It was required to add -- illegal-access=

Re: Any new releases coming out ?

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomee-dev/202109.mbox/%3CCAPkio3EHvmmPNo-kJrpGVFyZXUibsMLuceERvwxEnqqVSABCjQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Vote is running. Am Freitag, dem 03.09.2021 um 06:42 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > Hello, > > The question is in the subject. > > *9.0.0-M7 sin

Re: how to create an executable jar with new tomee-Bootstrap

> Hello, > > > > the example -> https://github.com/Daniel-Dos/tomee-JavaSe > > > > thanks > > > > Em qui., 2 de set. de 2021 às 17:03, Daniel Dias Dos Santos < > > daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > &

AW: how to create an executable jar with new tomee-Bootstrap

Hi, do you have some example code on GitHub to play with? Gruss Richard Von: Daniel Dias Dos Santos Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. September 2021 21:24:10 An: users@tomee.apache.org Betreff: how to create an executable jar with new tomee-Bootstrap Hello everybody, I'

Re: I have seen 9.0.0-M7 on the download site ...;

ght ? > > Regarding TCK results on TomEE 9.0.0-M7, congratulations but JMS > part > is missing, tight ? ;-) > Any update on MicroProfile 3.x, 4.x support ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message- > From: Zowalla, Richard > Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17

Re: I have seen 9.0.0-M7 on the download site ...;

There are some issues regarding 8.0.7 It has a regression in the JAX-RS landscape. Therefore, it is omitted on the download site. Relevant discussion can be found on the mailing list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomee-dev/202105.mbox/%3CFF0DDEDC-BE1A-4305-B737-4125DB7CA194%40gmail.c

Re: setting up the hikari connection pool with tomee

st sight things seem to work, but the devil is in > the details). > > I hope maybe someone can answer on that? > > Thank you again, > > Emmanuel > > - Original Message - > From: "Zowalla, Richard" > To: users@tomee.apache.org > Sent: Tue

Re: setting up the hikari connection pool with tomee

Hi, there were some discussions related to HikariCP on the lists a few days ago [1], [2], and [3]. I would try with [1] and [2]. Hope it helps. Gruss Richard [1] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/HikariCP-configuration-in-TomEE-td4678838.html [2] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.

Re: TomEEDataSourceCreator ReadOnlyConnectionpool

Hi, thanks for your email. Regarding TOMEE-2125 -> I just submitted a related PR [1] containing the proposed fix (+ unit test) Gruss Richard [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/762 Am Freitag, den 12.02.2021, 03:34 -0600 schrieb Inwolf: > Well, I've found the answer to the first question

Re: [ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Richard Zowalla

Thanks to all of you for your kind words and for this opportunity! TomEE has a very welcoming community. My journey started in 2015 (with TomEE 1.7.x), when my colleague, Martin W., urged me (hehe, sorry for the wording :-P) to join the d...@tomee.apache.org list to monitor potential discussions

Re: TomEE 8.0.5 tomcat/quartz-openejb-shade dependency versions

; http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:39 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > I created a related PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/742 > > > > Gruss > > R

Re: TomEE 8.0.5 tomcat/quartz-openejb-shade dependency versions

I created a related PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/742 Gruss Richard Am Montag, den 21.12.2020, 00:18 + schrieb Bruce Heavey: > I don’t really feel comfortable making contributions yet sorry - > better to leave that to the experts! > > But I’m happy to raise the JIRA ticket, I've cr

Re: Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support?

to provide a > > PRfor Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 ? As an alternative, I could create a > > SVNpatch file and send it to the Geronimo dev list? > > Thanks,Richard > > > > > > > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/trunk > > > > A

Re: Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support?

? Thanks, Richard [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/trunk Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2020, 10:44 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > > thanks for the fast feedback. > > I did some debugging and found that the only allowed protocol is > "TLSv1

Re: Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support?

27;m CC'ing Geronimo mailing list. Maybe Romain and > others > can help there. > > Jean-Louis > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:55 AM Zowalla, Richard &

Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support?

Hi all, I have updated our TomEE instances to 8.0.5 as (Geronimo) Java Mail 1.6 replaced the rather outdated (Geronimo) Java Mail 1.4 in this release. Up to now, we were using com.sun.mail jakarta.mail 1.6.5 provided as our mail

Re: MBean Annotations on TomEE8 and Java11 compilation problems

Hi, The related JAR file is "mbean-annotation-api-8.0.X.jar" (X = minor version number) containing the related class, which is indeed a "provided" dependency of the container. So this seems very strange to me. I did a minimal test setup (based on the link of the example), in which I could repro

Re: TOMEE-2770

a beans.xml with bean-discovery-mode="all". > Then perform several GET calls with a browser and you will the number > of dynamicProducer increase (1 per call). > Best Regards. > -Original Message-From: Zowalla, Richard [mailto: > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de] Sent: lundi 10

AW: TOMEE-2770

Hi Francois, it would be beneficial, if you could provide a little sample project, which can reproduce the issue. With this in hands, it will be much easier to dig into this issue. Best Richard Von: COURTAULT Francois [francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com]

Re: CXF CVE-2019-17573 and CVE-2019-12423

Hi Jon, I feel your pain. I am +1 for faster releases as well. Best,Richard Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2020, 14:36 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > It is too late, as the current VOTEs were posted before this was > announced,and I've been trying to get this release out for over a > month. > That b

Re: TomEE GraalVM native image

Hi Jon, personally, I agree with your view: +1 Richard Z Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2019, 09:39 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > If we're to roll an 8.0.1 any day now, its unlikely it'll have > aMicroProfile update, as there's a number of dependencies that get > pulled infor that functionality. We

Re: Re: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

Hi makkus, I have opened an jira issue for further investigation: https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2709 Could you upload the source code, you used for creating the WAR archive there? It could be beneficial, if we are going into debugging this issue. In addition, I can confirm, that t