you have getbehaviors() and removebehavior(), the rest belongs in some
WicketUtil class you write.
-igor
On 8/10/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Component class provides a method for removing a single IBehavior
> object:
>
> public Component remove(final IBehavior behavi
The Component class provides a method for removing a single IBehavior
object:
public Component remove(final IBehavior behavior)
Is there a similar method that will allow me to remove all IBehaviors of a
certain type?
I'd like to be able to do this:
Panel p;
...
p.removeBehaviorsW
Would the fact that wicket now uses a filter instead of a servlet have
an effect on trying to forward a request. I'm trying to forward a
request from the jsp/servlet portion of our app to a bookmarkable wicket
page using RequestDispatcher.forward(), but no matter what sort of path
I send it, I get
final CheckBox cb=new CheckBox("cb");
cb.setOutputMarkupId(true);
WebMarkupContainer label=new WebMarkupContainer("label") {
oncomponenttag(tag) { tag.put("for", cb.getMarkupId()); }
label.add(new PageLink("terms", TermsPage.class));
label.add(new PageLink("policy", PolicyPage.class));
agree t
Hi,
I asked this question before but didn't really understand the
response. I need to create a CheckBox at the bottom of a form
(ordinarily this is easy enough). The tricky part is that the check
box's label will contain two hyperlinks that correspond to the
underlined text in the examp
On 8/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the error-flow, and I don't really see why:
>
> try {
> ...query the database and build the provider and dataview
> } catch (SQLException e) {
> feedback.error("Very bad things happened");
> // What to do here??
> }
>
> should gener
On 8/10/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a functional base for this already in wicket-contrib-yui trunk.
> Needs a friendlier api and a bit of polish, but all the pieces are
> there. I've been very short on time, so if anyone feels like picking
> it up that would be great.
see DataTable
-igor
On 8/10/07, Pantaleoni, Andrea (KCTU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have to implement a dynamic table: depending on user choices or values
> of
> fields in database, the number of columns could change.
> e.g. In same case I can have 3 columns containing Labels or
you can use a listview inside a listview to achieve what you want.
but there is already a made component that fits the bill: datatatble. see
wicket-examples under repeaters
-igor
On 8/10/07, code runner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I have to implement a dynamic table: depending on
looks like fileInputStream is a field on your page, but it isnt
serializable. so dont store it as a field
-igor
On 8/10/07, legol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Iam doing something like this:
>
> FileUpload upload = uploadField.getFileUpload();
> if(upload!=null) {
>
Thanks,
this a nice workaround I mean to put component.setvisible(false) depending of
some parameters value.
the only not convenient thing is, I belevie, that the application load
anyway a lot of useless data from database.
In reality I think that in the future ListView component should be just a
On 8/10/07, Pantaleoni, Andrea (KCTU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Normally you put in the wicket:id of the listview component and in
>
> the single component previously added in the listview
> How could you manage that with two listview in the manner you indicate??
> Have you ever tried that?
Another option is to override onBeforeRender
The problem is that the component is not added to the parent in the
constructor yet:
add(new Foo());
First Foo constructor is called, then the add...
In your case, having an explicit contract about the parent isn't too
bad though. Gives an opportunit
Normally you put in the wicket:id of the listview component and in
the single component previously added in the listview
How could you manage that with two listview in the manner you indicate??
Have you ever tried that? are you sure?
Anyway I guess the problem of the match between components in f
I have a functional base for this already in wicket-contrib-yui trunk.
Needs a friendlier api and a bit of polish, but all the pieces are
there. I've been very short on time, so if anyone feels like picking
it up that would be great.
On 8/10/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope.
There are many ways ..
For example you can have two nested ListView, for example:
value
The first iterate over the row as usual, and the second over the columns.
The problem can be reduced to have a valid model to specify the columns.
This could be done, with a simple array of bean attr
Actually I'm using use 1.2
-Original Message-
From: Will Jaynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2007 13:52
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: getting component parent
Using 1.3. I have a panel which needs to create different internal
components depending on who it's parent
Using 1.3. I have a panel which needs to create different internal
components depending on who it's parent is. However, calling getParent()
in the constructor gives me null. I can make a constuctor that passes in
the parent. But I wonder if there is a different way. Is there some
other point wh
Hello,
I have to implement a dynamic table: depending on user choices or values of
fields in database, the number of columns could change.
e.g. In same case I can have 3 columns containing Labels or in other cases 5
containing Labels and form components(and so on).
To do that I'm using a ListView i
Hello,
I have to implement a dynamic table: depending on user choices or values of
fields in database, the number of columns could change.
e.g. In same case I can have 3 columns containing Labels or in other cases 5
containing Labels and form components(and so on).
To do that I'm using a ListView
Iam doing something like this:
FileUpload upload = uploadField.getFileUpload();
if(upload!=null) {
try {
fileInputStream = upload.getInputStream();
}
catch(IOException
i once thought of building menus but realized that the problem with menu is
that there are a million types based on different styles and javascripts out
there. compiling a factory of them is work indeed and the API will just
swell your wicket project. :)
I have a simple implementation like this da
> > Is there no menu component available somewhere? I looked
> > around in wicket and extensions, but didn't see one...
> Nope. There was one wicket-stuff project a while ago, but that wasn't
> too great (I'm guilty).
Ah! That's where I met you before... in a Crappy Code prison cell...
> I th
23 matches
Mail list logo
