If i were to change the layout or lets say the default button names when
using the Wizard class, is there any way to do it other than extending the
Wizard class itself and defining my custom markup ?
That depends on what you want to do. You can pass in false for the
addDefaultCssStyle
I don't know tbh. I believe the request body is encoded in UTF-8.
People usually use UTF-8, so no-one was complaining before. Can't you
just use UTF-8? It's much safer than latin1.
-Matej
On 10/20/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you configuring wicket and you appserver
Hi all,
I´m trying to replace a Panel with a Form when the user clicks a link like so
public void onClick() {
getPage().get(content).replaceWith(new
LoginForm(content, new User()));
}
The old content is a component extending Panel, and the new a
component LoginForm
What heavy session drawback are you talking about?
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
-
To
This is something for your container, and is specific to that IIUC.
You could check the servlet api for ServletContext
Martijn
On 10/20/07, glr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Can anyone tell me what the desired way is to query the value of the session
timeout from within Wicket?
Thanks
You are not doing anything really wrong,
its not Component.replaceWith that is complaining but the renderer.
Embedding the Form in a Panel is a reasonable solution, alternatively
you could add both components and toggle their visibility.
Martin
jar ade schrieb:
Hi all,
I´m trying to
Thanks a lot, I´ll go for the visibility-toggle in this case.
*/
On 10/21/07, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are not doing anything really wrong,
its not Component.replaceWith that is complaining but the renderer.
Embedding the Form in a Panel is a reasonable solution,
Hi,
I've mounted a page like this:
mount(new IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy(/page, MyPage.class));
MyPage class has a contructor which accepts PageParameters.
When I try to access the page with any of these URLs:
http://myserver/page/
or
http://myserver/page
the PageParameters contains a
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1092
Thanks for your help.
Ludovic
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy-behaves-strangely-when-there-is-no-parameter-in-the-URL-tf4666083.html#a13331634
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
Thanks for your support,
the problem is in PageMap.access():
...
// Remove whole page
remove(topPage);
Jan
--
Jan Bares
http://jan.vegetband.cz
Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe the problem is accessstackpagemap removing pages too eagerly.
Hi,
in my application I mount a page like this:
mountBookmarkablePage(/view, ViewGallery.class);
Then, on a page I try to make a bookmarkable page link like this:
final PageParameters pageParameters = new PageParameters(new HashMap() {
{
put(gallery, galleryId);
}
});
Guys,
Would sound like a very naive question, actually still in the process of
understand the different concepts in wicket, Wicket Models in this
particular case...so my question is
Wouldn't the below two statements act exactly the same given i have a person
object (which i would say both
Hi,
Is there any way to have multiple child tag in one page, like multiple
method in one class that can be extended?
I need to provide some way that other pages can extend base layout
that have multiple place like main, header, left to be extended.
If it is not possible to have multiple child in
Wouldn't the below two statements act exactly the same given i have a person
object (which i would say both acts as a model as well as an object to which
the form data is submitted) defined in a page.
add(new RequiredTextField(person.userName));
add(new
Is there any way to have multiple child tag in one page, like multiple
method in one class that can be extended?
I need to provide some way that other pages can extend base layout
that have multiple place like main, header, left to be extended.
Nope, that's not supported at this time. You can
Eelco,
Appreciate the quick follow up, so would it be OK to assume that every
page-component has to have a Model associated with it, either the model is
individually explicitly tagged with a component e.g. add(new
RequiredTextField(dateOfBirth, new PropertyModel(person, dateOfBirth)))
OR it
Appreciate the quick follow up, so would it be OK to assume that every
page-component has to have a Model associated with it,
You only need models when you have something to display (and possibly
receive) and use components that use models (which is the case for
most components we ship, but
You only need models when you have something to display (and possibly
receive)
I see..so how would you comment on a component like label (just came across
this example) where you still want to display something but can go ahead
without the usage of model like add(new Label(message,Hello
18 matches
Mail list logo