Ah..thanks a lotAlthoug I google it, I didnt find that. But I think
my code contains just this and others are not relevant.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> first, you did not show all your code. second, there is too much code to
> read through in an email and figure out whats wrong, create
Looking at it, in this case it might even make sense to do a static
googlemap:
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Well I just think that if you are using a gmap which is supposed to be
static, and never can be anything else..
Well I just think that if you are using a gmap which is supposed to be
static, and never can be anything else.. Then it does not make much
sense to add the listener stuff.
But as someone wrote I could just roll a label with an attribute modifier...
Martin Funk wrote:
Nino Saturnino Martinez V
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Yeah I know I did something similar for the openlayers contrib.. But I
wonder if you could provide a constructor which turns it all off?
What? More constructors? I was just about on the path to less constructors!
I just deprecated the constructors that
WebMarkupContainer body = new
WebMarkupContainer("pageStyle").setTransparentResolver(true);
-igor
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Tauren Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for advice on how to deal with the component hierarchy below.
> I'm getting a MarkupException and think tha
I'm looking for advice on how to deal with the component hierarchy below.
I'm getting a MarkupException and think that the problem is that the "body"
defined in base page is a sibling of content, header, and footer instead of
their parent. Content, header, and footer should be children of body.
A
Well, if your component was nested in a ListView ... what then?
Sven
Neil McT schrieb:
Yeah, I understand why this would be the case in say a ListView (when
repeated markup would not have a unique id) but when adding a behavior to a
component 'myId3' is no more unique than 'myId'. Under what ci
Yeah, I understand why this would be the case in say a ListView (when
repeated markup would not have a unique id) but when adding a behavior to a
component 'myId3' is no more unique than 'myId'. Under what circumstances
would the original id no longer be unique? I think that is what I am asking.
Hi Neil
It's id because it's the only thing unique..
Neil McT wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that when I add an Ajax behavior to a component, that components
id is changed - from 'myId' to say 'myId3'.
I know there are ways around this e.g. use the css class to identify the
component rather than the id
there are a lot of threads on this list that explain why wicket needs to
take over markup id and cannot reuse what you placed in markup.
-igor
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Neil McT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that when I add an Ajax behavior to a component, that component
Yeah I know I did something similar for the openlayers contrib.. But I
wonder if you could provide a constructor which turns it all off?
Martin Funk wrote:
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi Martin
I get the wicket ajax debug window.. And (slice from the simple page
below)
first, you did not show all your code. second, there is too much code to
read through in an email and figure out whats wrong, create a quickstart
project. third, there is already an example that shows how to do this
properly: http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/choice
-igor
On Sat, Oct 18, 2
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi Martin
I get the wicket ajax debug window.. And (slice from the simple page
below)