Thanks Vit,
your approach seems to be working. That is, use something like
Cookie cookie = new Cookie("name", "value");
WicketTester wicketTester = new WicketTester(new
MyApplication());
wicketTester.getServletRequest().addCookie(cooki
> With Wicket 1.3 only one page should be stored in session. You should
> check if you don't keep references between pages -> that would result
> in 1+N pages (with N being the number of pages you reference in your
> page).
That's optimized though, so shouldn't typically be a problem. See the
cust
pass the page instance into the confirmation page
setresponsepage(new confirmationpage(this)) or new confirmationpage(getpage());
then in confirmationpage setresponsepage(passedininstance)
-igor
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:02 PM, ketanbparekh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi i am trying to create
hi i am trying to create a generic confirmation page which can be called by
an page after its operation is done.
the confirmation page has a back button which clicked goes back to the page
which called the confirmation page.
eg -> edit user page calls -> confirm page, back button click calls->
If you can vote +1000 then.. that kinda defeats the purpose yeah ;)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> voting is the apache way. It focusses discussions, and quickly allows
> us to find decisions. These *must* happen on the list. +1000 for
> Jeremy's energy and vote threads.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Fri,
Hmm just saw this :
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-auth-openid/
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi Guys
Have any of you tried to do a openid integration ?
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
--
Hi Guys
Have any of you tried to do a openid integration ?
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
I'm sorry, I see now that I misunderstood the question :)
-- Edvin
Igor Vaynberg skrev:
your buttons in different forms will submit the form they are in, so
you lose any input form any other form. this is how html works - only
one form can be submitted.
wicket supports embedded forms, so if yo
So does that mean there is nothing already made to monitor session size
at container level instead of application level?
Adriano
Johan Compagner escreveu:
you can monitor what wicket does with the IRequestLogger
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:13, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:48, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am busy fixing it
> but it is not as straightforward as just replacing it with Object[]
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:38, jWeekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, your suggestion should stop that runtime e
i am busy fixing it
but it is not as straightforward as just replacing it with Object[]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:38, jWeekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, your suggestion should stop that runtime exception being thrown. A new
> (or more comprehensive) test for that method could confirm th
Cedric,
I have just started looking at http://www.wickext.org Wickext .
Is this the sort of thing you're thinking about?
For version 1.0 we hope to bind widget state back to Wicket as well.
Regards - Cemal
http://www.jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
thiebal wrote:
>
> Why don't we ha
Yes, your suggestion should stop that runtime exception being thrown. A new
(or more comprehensive) test for that method could confirm this.
What I described addresses a not totally unrelated but slightly broader
concern, and would not impact on any optimisations; it is not more important
than fi
you can monitor what wicket does with the IRequestLogger
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:13, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is not a direct wicket question, but important for wicket usage, so
> I'm asking here...
>
> What you use to monitor Tomcat sessions size?
Why don't we have some nice Javascript frameworks on top of Wicket
like what exists for wrapping GWT ?
http://extjs.com/explorer
http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase
Is there a reason why people implements these wrappers for GWT and not
for Wicket ?
We should be able to do exactly the same
Hi!
This is not a direct wicket question, but important for wicket usage, so
I'm asking here...
What you use to monitor Tomcat sessions size? (preferable something that
I can use in production)
I tried with JMX/jconsole and with LambdaProbe. The former doesn't seems
to have that info, and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1964
2008/12/1 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> we should add ibehavior.isVisibilityAllowed(Component) or something
> like that for 1.5 release. feel free to create a jira issue.
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:03 AM, kan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
we should add ibehavior.isVisibilityAllowed(Component) or something
like that for 1.5 release. feel free to create a jira issue.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:03 AM, kan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the next construction very often:
>
> [markup]
>
> Something here, description, comments e
your buttons in different forms will submit the form they are in, so
you lose any input form any other form. this is how html works - only
one form can be submitted.
wicket supports embedded forms, so if you embed all your other forms
into one form the input should not be lost.
-igor
On Mon, Dec
components should only be manipulated inside a servlet request. what
you should do i store the data somewhere and then let the components
update themselves during render by reading new data.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:21 AM, marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a simple wic
> The only problem right now is the cast to Component[]. The
> fix is easy, just change it to Object[]. The optimization
> makes a lot of sense and there is reason why it can't really
> be simple.
The simplest explanation is that the (synthetic) array "classes" both
extend Object but are not in
If you create a new Poll object, there is no magic that will bind that
to your form instead of the Poll object you wrapped in the
CompoundPropertyModel.
You could put the poll object as a local field member in the class, and
use PropertyModel(poll, "property-expression") for the fields instead
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008, marino wrote:
> // this is the event listener method itself, called from the Gigaspaces
> library
> // when some eventon their space is detected
It really sounds like it would be from within another
thread, right? The best way would be to refactor your code
so that Wicket code
Alright, this is my last try replying with MS Outlook. =) And I will also add
more info to help with this thread.
You can use borders to acomplish what you want. Here's an example:
#JAVA
public abstract class ConditionalHiddenBorder extends Border {
public ConditionalHiddenBorder(String id)
Excerpts from the listener class
// RemoteEventListener is an Interface of the GigaSpaces middleware
// the class is very similar to the example UserProvider , and holds a list
of user calendars;
// I omit here details
public class UserProvider extends SortableDataProvider implements
RemoteEven
Use a border
PS: I hate Microsoft Outlook
-Mensagem original-
De: kan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2008 09:03
Para: users@wicket.apache.org
Assunto: make invisible if model object is null
I use the next construction very often:
[markup]
Somethi
Use a border
-Mensagem original-
De: kan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de dezembro de 2008 09:03
Para: users@wicket.apache.org
Assunto: make invisible if model object is null
I use the next construction very often:
[markup]
Something here, description, comments
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008, marino wrote:
> I have a simple wicket application built around the DefaulDataTable example.
> In the same program I have an Event Listener class which is called outside
> the wicket application context. This class produces data that I would like
> to show
> in the current wic
Hello,
I have a simple wicket application built around the DefaulDataTable example.
In the same program I have an Event Listener class which is called outside
the wicket application context. This class produces data that I would like
to show
in the current wicket page, but when I call any operat
I use the next construction very often:
[markup]
Something here, description, comments etc:
[java]
add(new Label("something")
{
@Override
public boolean isVisible() {
return super.isVisible() && getDefaultModelObject() != null;
}
});
And there are a lot
Hi,
I am creating a form in the next format:
private abstract class EditForm extends Form{
public EditForm(String id, Poll poll) {
/*
* We wrap the poll bean with a CompoundPropertyModel, this
allows
* us to easily connect form components to t
31 matches
Mail list logo
