Hello,
Wicket uses input validation on the presentation layer. This leads often to
code duplication and I'm looking for a way to avoid it.
Example: I have a registration form where you fill in your first and last name,
password and so on. Every field has its restrictions like max length or
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-igor
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Christian Helmbold
under wicketstuff for 1.2 I found the little project wicket-contrib-navmenu.
I started to update it for Wicket 1.4-rc2.
Does this make sense or is there a better way to create hierarchy-like menues?
Eelco?
I know there is a TabbedPanel component.
But I somehow feel strange to implement my whole
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Wicket in Action does discuss menus: see page 185 (index entry: menu),
though not multilevel menus.
You are right, the easy way is described...
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Just take a look at YUI-menu or some jquery plugin for menus. The
reason for not continuing
done!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
open a jira issue and add a quickstart please.
-igor
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Jens Alenius jens.alen...@megasol.se
wrote:
Hi.
Found something that might be a wicket ajax bug.
This code wont work in Firefox and we believe that its the Ajax xml
Wicket in Action does discuss menus: see page 185 (index entry: menu),
though not multilevel menus.
Just take a look at YUI-menu or some jquery plugin for menus. The
reason for not continuing the menu component is that there are enough
alternatives available for rendering a menu. And most folks
I just figured out that the deal is that SWFObject doesn't
like to be set visible false on page load then visible true via Ajax.
Any thoughts on how to get around this?
Ajax in Wicket needs the page DOM to have an element with the id it is
supposed to replace with the output of a (now
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is a
matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them in a
sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to create
fields in a class instead of a
Hello,
Reference for this post:
http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?p=239559#post239559 (the
related Spring Security thread)
It actually seems my interpretation about how it might work was
correct below (though my original interpretation was wrong, but let's
not talk about that one ;-)
Hi.
How about using varargs or a similar approach in your TextField:
code
public class ValidatedTextFieldT extends TextFieldT{
public ValidatedTextField(String id, final IModelT model, boolean
required, AbstractValidator... validators)
{
super(id, model);
TextField t = new ValidatedTextField(id, new Model(your Model),
And remember to use Model.of(your Model)
**
Martin
http://tyoajanseuranta.blogit.fi/ Wicket työajanseuranta
true,
EmailAddressValidator.getInstance(),
StringValidator.maximumLength(50));
Hello,
I want to have a radio group that looks like this:
How do I have to set the model of the Radio Group? Must this be a Boolean
one and what is set with getObject and setObject methods?
input name=radiogroup wicket:id=field1 type=radio
id=radiogroup13-field114 value=radio10
You can check out my wicket-advanced application that I wrote for a
talk I gave to our local Java users group. In there, I implemented a
Spring Security-based implementation. Here's my session class:
If the fields (user/pwd) always go together on every pages, why not having
having one root Panel (called MyPanel) knowing the fields , validation etc
and several Panels that simply extends MyPanel ; avec each child has its
own layouts.
Best regards,
Gabriel Kastenbaum
http://blog.oxiane.com
Hi Christoph
This was due to YuiHeaderContributor being moved to another package. I was
doing some house keeping :p
it should be fixed in /yui/ trunk now (no change in yui-examples).
can you try again?
Joshua
2009/5/5 Christoph Grün chris...@gmx.at
Hello,
I have downloaded the
Hi Joshua!
Thanks a lot!!
It works.
Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joshua Lim [mailto:lim.j...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 08. Mai 2009 13:45
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: yui slider component does not work
Hi Christoph
This was due to YuiHeaderContributor
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized.
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized.
uh that was:
class EmailField extends TextField[Email]
where the square brackets are angle brackets :)
Christian Helmbold-2 wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is
a matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes
I'm using an AjaxTabbedPanel and I would like to obtain the following
behaviours:
1) user input must be retained when switching tabs
2) tabs link should skip only the requireness validation but not all
other validators so the user can switch from tab to tab if he doesn't
insert bad input
when used with forms it is a better idea to output the entire form and
use javascript tabs.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Alfredo Aleandri
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
I'm using an AjaxTabbedPanel and I would like to obtain the following
behaviours:
1) user input must be
Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my
application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a fresh model
object without an ID, the LoadableDetachableModel object contains no ID to load
the model object from the DB on the next request.
Because
Can you switch to using UUIDs? That saved me a LOT of headaches!
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my
application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a fresh
very strange i'll look into it soon, when I get the app thats gonna
use it up to 1.4
2009/5/7 RoyBatty math...@afjochnick.net:
Thanks Nino.
A little bit more input on the Mootip performance bit, if you're interested.
Basically, when we're using it it behaves quite differently from the mootip
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/09/building-a-smart-entitymodel/
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my
application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a
Hi!
I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my
wicketTests and components.
I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to
get it right
Anybody have the same experience?
How about introducing type-safety and path-safety/identity into
component
See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5
Martijn
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my
wicketTests and components.
I always have
Martin Makundi ha scritto:
Hi!
I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my
wicketTests and components.
I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to
get it right
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached
utility
I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really
screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
define loading
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Chris ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote:
I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really
screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this?
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached
utility class that, given a component, can print its containment
structure, along with the eventual component classes and
model values (toString-ed).
Well... printDoc and wicket
getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true);
you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like
this may work very well for you
TestUtils.attachTestId(Component c, String id) {
if (application.get().getconfigurationtype()!=production) {
c.setmatadata(testkey, id);
}
}
then in your code
Form form=new Form(..);
you can also create a test panel that contains just your form and test
that instead of creating the entire complex page just to test the
form. break your tests into small units and test in isolaton. your
test harness panel can have a getter that gives you direct access the
the form you are
Well, strings all over the place, if I get what you mean.
But I write the tests first and they define what the paths and ids
should be and Wicket is really quick about discovering when the
implementation doesn't follow spec (i.e. tests).
Doing a small step at a time takes you there faster.
you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like
this may work very well for you
I know that with more work I can make ... more work.
What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have
intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors
etc.
Use an IDE plugin?
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like
this may work very well for you
I know that with more work I can make ... more work.
What I am looking for is a
But I write the tests first and they define what the paths and ids
should be and Wicket is really quick about discovering when the
implementation doesn't follow spec (i.e. tests).
I concentrate on coding.. sometimes I write the implementation,
sometimes the tests, whichever goes faster until
Use an IDE plugin?
That's a hack, not a design.
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
so what you are saying is that adding one line of code to mark the
component you want to test, and then being able to find that component
easily in your test - independent of its place in hierarchy and
without relying on strings - is more work?
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martin
wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at
compile time. this is one of the most powerful features of wicket.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
you should really use visitors for this kind of
What about introducing an xpath-ish like expression API that could
help you search for components within the hierarchy?
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at
compile time. this is one
Martin Makundi wrote:
Use an IDE plugin?
That's a hack, not a design.
Wow...I'm new to this list, but I doubt you can expect much help with
that attitude. I suggest you request a refund for your Wicket license
and support subscription and go find a tool that better fits your needs.
Oh,
Hello All!
Im facing problems trying to Stream/download files through portlet. I also
used DynamicWebResource and a Resource link to serve the Resource Data. On a
simple Wicket application everything works fine, but when my war is deployed
as a portlet into a Liferay 5 instance, it doesnt work.
Martin Makundi ha scritto:
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached
utility class that, given a component, can print its containment
structure, along with the eventual component classes and
model values (toString-ed).
Well... printDoc and wicket
Solved.
Its a Liferay issue.
http://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-1911
I was using portlet names and filter-mapping with a - char.
I have to use the same string value for the portlet name and the
filter-mapping stuff... without the - char, cause liferay (i dont have
idea why) removes this
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as
1,2,3. I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing something.
Any help is appreciated.
I mean the DAO that populates my model, runs 2 times.
Oblivian wrote:
I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really
screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this?
-
To
if you use a detachable model connected to your dao then it will call
the dao every render.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Oblivian ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote:
I mean the DAO that populates my model, runs 2 times.
Oblivian wrote:
I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple
new ichoicerendererstring {
object getid(string object, int index) { return object; }
string getdisplayvalue(string object) { return object; }
}
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chris ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote:
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new
Think I figured it out by doing something like this. Is this the right way?
public class StringChoiceRender implements IChoiceRenderer {
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
return object.toString();
}
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index) {
return
according to this post;
http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf
the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to get generics.
I'm finding the missing generics a real pain in the behind but I also
have a recent checkout of the 1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicketstuff, and it does
not yet have generics.
Does
Hi,
it's not abandoned. There's a project created for it in wicketstuff
jira that can be used to submit patches.
-Matej
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
according to this post;
http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf
the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to
Found the patch, will assign it to jira issue. And possibly apply after review.
-Matej
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it's not abandoned. There's a project created for it in wicketstuff
jira that can be used to submit patches.
-Matej
On Fri,
Thanks.
Oblivian wrote:
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as
1,2,3. I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing
something.
Any help is
That would be great!
If you need an area to focus on, it's the generics that type things
like getSelectedItems() etc. and some of the other common overrides.
- Brill Pappin
On 8-May-09, at 5:57 PM, Matej Knopp wrote:
Found the patch, will assign it to jira issue. And possibly apply
Interesting. I googled for printDoc Wicket but did not find anything.
Where is that utility?
public void printDocument() {
System.out.println(tester.getServletResponse().getDocument());
}
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe,
wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at
compile time. this is one of the most powerful features of wicket.
Yes but each component is always fixed relative to its parent. The
html markup fixes the hierarcy, so something might be devised here.
What about
57 matches
Mail list logo
