Or if you navigate to yet another page and then click browser back Button and
click the Ajax button that would give the testString "null"..right ?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> last accessed page instance is stored in http session and therefore in
> memory without being serialized. if you ran this o
Guys,
I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses
group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either:
- adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything
over from Wicket S
Hi,
> And the related html:
>
>
>
>
>
>
remove and . wicket:id="myNewPanel" is not
part of the wicket:child declaration of the parent class.
Best Regards,
Ilja Pavkovic
--
binaere bauten gmbh · tempelhofer ufer 1a · 10961 berlin
+49 · 171 · 9342
[ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x ] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
>
> Pulling more code into Apache Wicket doesn't look like the best option to
me.
Looking at
http://www.ohloh.net/p/wicket/contributors?query=&sort=latest_commit I'd be
more interesed in ideas of creating more
You're right, i just want a consistent url look.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2010 16:52
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy + WebRequestCodingStrategy =
resource UR
Ups, sorry. The post was not for me.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2010 16:52
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy + WebRequestCodingStrategy =
resource URLs are not en
Hello,
I would like to know how Wicket handles multiple submits of the same form (ie.
"double-clicking"). Somehow I always assumed only the first POST request would
cause the onSubmit() handlers to be called. Now it looks like I'm either going
to have to re-evaluate that assumption or submit a
-Use a veil to block the page and avoid multiple submits?
-resubmit safe form:
http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2008/12/wicket-resubmitsafeform/?
Ernesto
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Edmund Urbani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know how Wicket handles multiple submits of the same form
> (
On 01/22/10 14:23, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
-Use a veil to block the page and avoid multiple submits?
-resubmit safe form:
http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2008/12/wicket-resubmitsafeform/?
Ernesto
Well, so much for my delusion regarding Wicket forms already being
"resubmit-safe". ;)
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/12/preventing-double-ajax-requests-in-3-lines-of-code/
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Edmund Urbani wrote:
> On 01/22/10 14:23, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
>
>> -Use a veil to block the page and avoid multiple submits?
>> -resubmit safe form:
>> http://www.c
On 01/22/10 14:48, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/12/preventing-double-ajax-requests-in-3-lines-of-code/
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Edmund Urbani wrote:
Thanks again. I need this for non-AJAX requests, too. So I would probably use
this solution instead
I have no idea... But if it doesn't you could look at how modal window JS
works and do something similar to create a veil that works also for IE6. I
know IE6 have problems with drop downs sticking over any div layer... and
the solution was to disable them... but do not take my word for granted...
Hello,
I'm currently developing wicket based application, which displays alarms on map
and allows their modification.
New alarms are sent to server through soap service and map with few other
components on page for all browser clients needs to be refreshed.
I'm using wicketstuff-push for the pu
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
> Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses
> group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either:
>
> - adopt Wicke
On 22.01.2010, at 03:18, vasil.pup...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://old.nabble.com/dynamically-adding-components-to-a-ListView-td26626657.html
>
> In this post you said "You found it". Could you please post how did you do it?
>
> Zinovii
in addPanel()
replaced
panels.add(panel);
with
panels.g
I am a user of Wicket Security and I would prefer:
[x] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
[] keep
Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
best regards
giovanni
From: Martin Grigorov
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: d...@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Fri, January 2
> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
I am biased, yes, but I much prefer Shiro in my Wicket apps too :)
- Les
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>>
Assuming adopting it into Apache Wicket would mean being in the wicket jar
instead of an optional jar.
[ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
[x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> > [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ben Tilford wrote:
> Assuming adopting it into Apache Wicket would mean being in the wicket jar
> instead of an optional jar.
Huh? What part of
> - adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything
> over from Wicket Stuff into a subproject within
Hi, guys.
Just use PropertyModel.
Instead of this:
container.add(new ListView("panels", panels) { ... }
use this
container.add( new ListView>( this, "panels" ) ) { ... }
where 'this' is referenced to instance of class that contains list of panels
as it's property.
And check PropertyModel
Hi Martijn!
> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket
> [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
Best regards, --- Jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-
So it turns out there were a couple of issues preventing the yui context
menu from working correctly after an ajax request.
Even though there was a call to clearContent on the context menu during the
on show event yui seemed to ignore this. This resulted in a doubling up of
some menu items especia
-1 on bringing this into the core. its more code to maintain and we
are busy enough already making improvements to the core itself.
-igor
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project.
> Currently the project li
I am in doubt. What I think would be best are creating a parent framework
like wicket ioc. And then the different security providers could use that..
Does it seem reasonable?
That would mean keeping Wicket security at stuff, but probably extracting
interfaces? And maybe adopting a few committers f
Also -1 on bringing it into core. I don't feel it has wide enough adoption
to justify it being maintained by core committers. There's too many
security options out there.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> -1 on bringing
You are putting view objects inside the model of other view object. Models
are meant to keep your application domain data, and over that you create
your view. So:
For what MyPanel was designed?
1 - For present MyData
container.add(new ListView("panels", panels) {
protected void populateItem
Hi to all wicketers,
My current assignment is a pretty big web application to build with wicket.
Right now I am studying the framework and in my background thread thinking
about the possible problems...
One of my biggest concerns is a testing, better said functional testing. As
many of you are
Consider using Junit for business layer and Selenium for view layer.
I use that,but my project is small.
And don't use watir, i had a bad experience with it.
NM
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Marzia Forli wrote:
> Hi to all wicketers,
>
> My current assignment is a pretty big web application to
Hi,
I am trying to use SimpleAttributeModifier to make an ADD MORE link
invisible once the maximum number of text fields that it adds have been
reached.
But I can not get it to render the link component.
My code:
addLink = new AjaxSubmitLink("addRow", form) {
private static final l
target.addComponent(addLink) ??
BTW you could override isVisible() and getOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag() instead
of the attribute modifier.
Sven
Anna Simbirtsev wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use SimpleAttributeModifier to make an ADD MORE link
invisible once the maximum number of text fields that
Hi,
I have a quartz job that sends emails containing links to pages rendered by
Wicket. All these links have parameters.
Is there a way of doing the equivalent of
RequestCycle.get().urlFor(pageclass, parameters) from a quartz job?
At the moment it's hardcoded to generate the url but if the Wick
Hi,
I have a quartz job that sends emails containing links to pages rendered by
Wicket. All these links have parameters.
Is there a way of doing the equivalent of RequestCycle.get().urlFor(
pageclass, parameters) from a quartz job?
At the moment it's hardcoded to generate the url but if the Wic
Thanks a lot, it worked.:)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> target.addComponent(addLink) ??
>
> BTW you could override isVisible() and getOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag()
> instead of the attribute modifier.
>
> Sven
>
>
> Anna Simbirtsev wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to use
mount the page so the url is well known, then you do not need wicket
to construct it for you.
-igor
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Help System wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a quartz job that sends emails containing links to pages rendered by
> Wicket. All these links have parameters.
>
> Is there a
I've got a really simple page, which has components of Label, ListView, etc.
The only component (and correctly so) that stores anything in the Pagemap that
gets saved to disk is a Link. But subsequent refreshes of that same page,
without doing anything in the UI, keeps increasing the storage fo
35 matches
Mail list logo
