Erik,
Its been a while since I implemented that code but as far as I
remember the CDATA parts are embedded in a bigger XML wich is streamed
back to the client: CDATA is needed because grid cell contents can be
anything so you have to use it to make sure that the XML you stream
back is well formed.
whatever is creating the textfield should add the appropriate validator
-igor
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Warren Bell
wrote:
> I have a ListView that adds one TextField to each ListItem. These
> TextFields need to have different types of validators added to them
> depending on a condition.
I have a ListView that adds one TextField to each ListItem. These
TextFields need to have different types of validators added to them
depending on a condition. One TextField in the first ListItem may need
an email validator while the TextField in the next ListItem may need a
number range validator
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:46 PM, gnugrf wrote:
>
> ok, I had read that in a post from several years ago, it just didnt make
> sense to me, because I thought "alive and well" would mean that is has some
> ability to work with a more current version of wicket. a bit misleading
> first response.
>
I have been looking at the example from jqgrid and as far as I can
understand the resource listener is used to stream back the XML content as
CDATA from the server to the browser. However, I cannot see how it would be
possible to stream back XML from the browser to the server.
One way I can imagin
Hi Ernesto,
The approach you suggest does fit my needs, especially if I can send XML
content from the browser to the server. I am exploring possibilities and one
of those is using wicketAjaxPost(). The other one is the jqgrid approach
which might be more flexible.
I cannot quite understand how i
Hello. Sorry my bad english.
Component RadioChoice with AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior has different
behavior in Firefox and IE7. Source:
public class TestPage extends WebPage
{
private List values = Arrays.asList(-1, 1);
Hello!
I got confused on what is the intended behavior of the dropdownchoice
with integers.
I wanted to create a dropdownchoice, which would list a range of
integers for user to select.
It seems to me, that if I call the setType(Integer.class), then it
changes the way it is processed when I subm
I tried overriding FormComponent.onValid() like this:
TextField name_field = new TextField("name", _name)
{
@Override
protected void onValid()
{
super.onValid();
_delete_button.setEnabled(true);
There you go:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3001
Kind regards,
Daniel
On 18.08.2010 18:15, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
sounds like a bug, open a jira ticket please.
-igor
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Soneira
wrote:
Why does AjaxRequestTarget.get() not behave like in 1
sounds like a bug, open a jira ticket please.
-igor
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Soneira
wrote:
> Why does AjaxRequestTarget.get() not behave like in 1.4.10?
>
> Code:
> --
> ...
> new AjaxLink("link") {
> �...@override
> public void onClick(AjaxRequestTa
You can have a variable that contains an indication that something was
done. In the CloseButtonCallback you clear that variable and in the
WindowClosedCallback you check to see whether that variable reports
that something was done. If it was, you report to the calling page.
For me, the variable w
Why does AjaxRequestTarget.get() not behave like in 1.4.10?
Code:
--
...
new AjaxLink("link") {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
feedback("link clicked");
}
}
public void feedback(String message) {
info(message);
Aja
IModel#setObject
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Alis wrote:
>
>
> Hello! I need help. How do i clear input the user in the autocomplete?
>
> With what method?
>
> Thank you!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Object-AutoComplete-Clear-Input-tp23
Hello! I need help. How do i clear input the user in the autocomplete?
With what method?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Object-AutoComplete-Clear-Input-tp2329930p2329930.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.
There is a ticket for that. It will be fixed for 1.5-M2.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Soneira
wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I kindly disagree.
> wicket-util-1.5-M1.jar (and wicket-request?) should be part of the zipped
> distribution (within the "lib" directory).
> I've found a copy in the
Hey there,
I kindly disagree.
wicket-util-1.5-M1.jar (and wicket-request?) should be part of the
zipped distribution (within the "lib" directory).
I've found a copy in the file "lib/wicket-examples-1.5-M1.war" by now.
Kind regards,
Daniel
On 18.08.2010 14:31, Martin Grigorov wrote:
You need
You need to add the new wicket-util.jar and wicket-request.jar
Using Maven will save you time to debug such kind of problems...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Soneira
wrote:
> Hi fellow wicketeers,
>
> I've just downloaded the latest milestone release of wicket (1.5-M1) from
> http://ww
Hi,
see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/releases/wicket-1.5-M1/wicket-util/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/convert/IConverter.java
you need wicket-util.jar too
Regards,
Peter
2010-08-18 14:25 keltezéssel, Daniel Soneira írta:
> Hi fellow wicketeers,
>
> I've just downloaded the la
Hi fellow wicketeers,
I've just downloaded the latest milestone release of wicket (1.5-M1)
from http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.5-M1.
I'm using the following JARs:
- wicket-1.5-M1.jar
- wicket-extensions-1.5-M1.jar
- wicket-ioc-1.5-M1.jar
- wicket-spring-1.5-M1.jar
I wanted
Thanks, it seems I had an iframe which behaved badly after applying the
locale URL coding strategy from the tutorial.
Instead of ,
the output was which led to a call to "localhost:8080/" which led to the other
requests.
In fact they weren't redirects, they were continuous requests.
Sorry if this
Thanks a lot Igor. That explains it all.
I was able to fix it today by using
visitChildren(ChildPanel.class, new IVisitor())
instead of
visitChildren( new IVisitor())
I guess, else it tries to add teh behaviour to all objects up the hierarchy
instead of restricting itself to only the ones on C
Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] schrieb:
What is the best practice for where to put business logic in Wicket.
I don't know if it is the best practice, but here is how we use it:
We have several projects / modules like
myApp-dao
myApp-service
myApp-wicket-ui
Our wicket app then depends on those proje
Hi,
I filed a testcase here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3000
Bernard
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:47:22 +1200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I switched off cookie suport in FireFox 3.6.3 to test whether an
>application still works via URL rewriting:
>
>In FireFox Tools|Option|Privacy|History|F
Hi,
I switched off cookie suport in FireFox 3.6.3 to test whether an
application still works via URL rewriting:
In FireFox Tools|Option|Privacy|History|FireFox will:Use Custom
Settings for History|Uncheck "Accept Cookies from Sites"
Then with the most basic panel replacement (no AJAX), I always
25 matches
Mail list logo