I am migrating from 1.3.4 to 1.5.7
No in my Html some places extra quotes are exits but my Html was working
fine in 1.3.4
Now in 1.5.7 parsing exception is coming
I can not modified htmls as i am having around 1k htmls
please suggest what to do and how to solve this
--
View this message
Hi,
If your images/css are in the web root then use something like
images/image.img in your .html.
Wicket will make the url relative to the web root no matter what mount
path you use for the page.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Wicket and
Hi,
I don't think this is anyhow related to Wicket.
Here are the GMail SMTP related props I use successfully:
mail.server.host=smtp.gmail.com
mail.server.port=587
mail.server.username=my.em...@gmail.com
mail.server.password=my-passwd
mail.server.starttls.enable=true
You may also check the docs
Hi,
You better fix your HTML. This will improve the way it is rendered too.
I hope you don't have invalid HTML in all these 1k html files.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:09 AM, vinitty vini...@gmail.com wrote:
I am migrating from 1.3.4 to 1.5.7
No in my Html some places extra quotes are exits but
Hmm
So there is no other way ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Avoiding-XMlPullParser-Parse-exception-tp4651210p4651214.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, that's what I observed and described below. And that behavior
is not appropriate for my use case.
So, how can I stop Wicket to make the url relative to the web root
no matter what mount path I use for the page?
I want to *change* that: my designer delivers HTML where the images
are *not*
Hi!
We are looking for a telecommuting wicket private contractor to do
some application development using Wicket (1.4.x).
We prefer a direct contract with the developer-contractor instead of
software companies.
**
Martin
http://code.google.com/p/koodaripalvelut-wicket/
But why we have to write userForm ? What is an idea behind of this ?
Why get(username) is not enough ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-a-way-to-search-component-by-its-wicket-ID-tp4651175p4651217.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
Martin,
Yes I use smtp props that are similar to what you have shared. Kindly see
my initial post for the smtp properties used by me.
I may sound stupid but the same piece of code runs fine when using
wicket-1.4.x.
And I use the following wicket related dependencies:
- wicket
-
Because the id is unique only within the markup container of a component.
It need not be unique in a page. This is by design.
For more details refer:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/component-hierarchy.html
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM, arkadyz111 azelek...@gmail.com wrote:
But why we have
Hi Hielke
First, I want to say thanks for wiquery. I integrated wiquery in a big
project with success and we are happy with them.
I know that the 2 code snippets do exactly the same. The first uses the
wicket mechanism and the second uses the jquery mechanism. I read at
Hi there,
I'm not really sure if searching a component by its ID is a good idea - It
kinda' breaks modularity and goes against the OO approach.
I have never searched a component by its ID but assuming you need the full
path (hierarchy) to it, such component will be hard to use in any other
Hi Marco,
I'm also based in Vienna and this sounds interesting.
Can you provide me with some more details about the project and what exactly
you are looking for.
Best,
Gerwin Brunner
P.S.: Wir können die Unterhaltung auch auf Deutsch durchführen :)
--
View this message in context:
I agree, but how should the code be? At the end it has to be placed in the
model.
Do you have any suggestion?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Checkbox-in-DataTable-is-not-reflecting-its-sts-in-checkbox-tp4651174p4651225.html
Sent from the Users
You have 2 choices:
1) put the boolean as a property of your KostenOV and reference it with
a model (e.g. propertyModel)
2) Use a CheckGroup and multiple checkboxes which use the id of KostenOV
as their value. Have a look at:
Hi Marco,
I'm also based in Vienna and this sounds interesting.
Can you provide me with some more details about the project and what exactly
you are looking for.
Best,
Gerwin Brunner
P.S.: Wir können die Unterhaltung auch auf Deutsch durchführen :)
--
View this message in context:
If you use wicket-component-expressions from com.googlecode.londonwicket you
can get to the list of all the components on the page that have that
username id via a regexp of **:username, but as James mentioned earlier,
the ID is not unique and your wicket component tree might have such multiple
Wicket rewrite the SRC attribute of the image as relative to your webapp
context unless you declare that image as a wicket component, give it a
wicket:id and then use a ContextImage.
Thus you would turn a img src=../images/image.jpg to a img wicket:id=img
src=../images/image.jpg.
If you do
Thanks a lot. In our case, we have an AjaxButton that maps to a input
type=submit.
Would using the input type Button get rid of this problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketRuntimeException-Submit-Button-is-not-enabled-tp4651180p4651231.html
No, they are interchangeable.
On 14/08/2012 11:42 AM, eugenebalt wrote:
Thanks a lot. In our case, we have an AjaxButton that maps to a input
type=submit.
Would using the input type Button get rid of this problem?
--
View this message in context:
It is true that we have multiple buttons on our form that we are
disabling/hiding selectively.
Our scenario: a panel that contains the button Edit, and then when it's
clicked, the panel opens and Edit is replaced by two other visible buttons
- Submit and Cancel. Edit is gone. We need this dynamic
As an idea, I tend to keep the panel edit/view state as a boolean and then
toggle the label on the button and control the behavior of the button press
via an if-else statement in the onSubmit() of the button.
This helps because I only have a single Edit/Save button and I toggle from
labels to
Running this example from the apache website it's working ok,
But when i run the sample example on my tomcat server and open it in an IE9
browser: i see no reaction if a choose another tab
When I try this on Chrome or Safari it works fine.
How to resolve this with IE9?
Here a debug list:
If you're talking about:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/tabbed-panel?2
That works fine with IE: 9.0.8112.16421, perhaps you blocked JavaScript from
executing?
~ Thank you,
Paul Bors
-Original Message-
From: Delange [mailto:delan...@telfort.nl]
Sent: Tuesday,
24 matches
Mail list logo