Hi there, I finally open sourced the tool and added a few options as my
team requested internally : failing build if key count mismatch
(overridable via a property) and outputting empty property values to the
console while building.
You can find it here :
Good morning,
All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to say a
big THANK YOU to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere.
His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it.
According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an
AjaxRequestTarget
Hi,
i'm trying to use the markup provided by html5 boilerplate:
http://html5boilerplate.com/
They use !--[if lt IE 7] ![endif]-- comments to render different
opening html tags for different versions of Internet Explorer, easing CSS
selectors for IE.
Here's how it looks like:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3433
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Robert Gründler r.gruend...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to use the markup provided by html5 boilerplate:
http://html5boilerplate.com/
They use !--[if lt IE 7] ![endif]-- comments to render different
Thanks, Let me try to generate the error. But it's quite shocking that
before mentioning the error number, it was open and after mention suddenly
you can not re produce. May be in small application it can not be reproduce
but in large production it can. Over net you will find few others also get
Hi,
I closed the ticket because the reporter didn't provide us (the Wicket
developers) with an application that reproduces the problem for a long
period.
As soon such application is attached to the ticket the ticket will be
reopened and addressed.
Please feel free to attach a quickstart
I have a DropDownChoice that should update some form fields when the user
selects an item. My selection-changed-listener code is along the lines of:
form.modelChanging();
T obj = model.getObject();
obj.setFoo(newSelection.getFoo());
obj.setBar(newSelection.getBar());
form.modelChanged();
Hi Pierre,
Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the rest of
the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in
production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with jsr356)
maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they
I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector and
useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an httpd for
the moment, but I'm not in production.
I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate the
results to you.
As a side-note, on the
Have you considered nginx? We use httpd but our reverse-proxying needs are
pretty simple. I've been meaning to try nginx.
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.comwrote:
I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that
The workaround we use is to have multiple html close tags:
!--[if lt IE 7]/html![endif]--
!--[if IE 7]/html![endif]--
!--[if IE 8]/html![endif]--
!--[if gt IE 8]!--/html!--![endif]--
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Robert Gründler r.gruend...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to use the
We depend heavily on ajp. Our application server needs to know the exact
url the request was made to. This is very hard to get right with plain http
proxying (if not impossible). The main reason we use httpd in front of our
application server(s) is for load balancing and status information
We have a Panel which contains a WebMarkupContainer which contains a ListView
repeater. The ListView repeats rows of 3 checkboxes; its populateItem is:
protected void populateItem(ListItemEDocsPermissionModel item) {
EDocsPermissionModel perm = item.getModelObject();
CheckBox cb1 = new
Do you have the disabled attribute in your markup source?
Sven
On 08/14/2013 04:08 PM, eugenebalt wrote:
We have a Panel which contains a WebMarkupContainer which contains a ListView
repeater. The ListView repeats rows of 3 checkboxes; its populateItem is:
protected void
YES. That was the exact issue. Thanks Sven.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Checkboxes-automatically-disabled-in-ListView-repeater-tp4660888p4660890.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On the home page the Apache Wicket 6.9.1 released
http://wicket.apache.org/2013/07/10/wicket-6.9.1-released+copy.html link
points to
http://wicket.apache.org/2013/07/10/wicket-6.9.1-released+copy.html which is
a 404.
~ Thank you,
Paul Bors
Take a look at how one drop-down updates the other via Ajax in the Wicket
Examples at:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/choice
I suggest you do something similar instead of trying to re-implement part of
the form processing in your code.
Besides, what is going to happen when
I suppose you're using the breadcrumbs from the wicket-extensions as per
this Wicket Library example:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/breadcrumb
Then see the API for the getActive() method of the IBreadCrumbModel:
I need Wicket to respond to a post request from AngularJS.
I set up a page in wicket like this but the request parameters are always
empty
@MountPath(value = /api/my/rest/url)
public class MyPostHandler extends SecureWebPage {
public MyPostHandler () {
final
I have a Panel (P1) which contains its own form (P1_F1).
The P1 panel also contains another panel inside itself, P1_A, which has its
own inner form (let's call it P1_A_F1).
Whenever the P_F1's validation is called, I also have to call the P1_A_F1
form validation. It doesn't get called
Have you checked the Wiki pages?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Nested+Forms
Which use-case are your referring to again?
~ Thank you,
Paul Bors
-Original Message-
From: eugenebalt [mailto:eugeneb...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 2:20 PM
To:
I found that this works but I'm not sure if there is a better way of doing
this:
@MountPath(value = /api/my/rest/url)
public class MyPostHandler extends SecureWebPage {
public MyPostHandler () {
final WebRequest webRequest = (WebRequest) getRequest();
final HttpServletRequest rawRequest
Take a look at how one drop-down updates the other via Ajax in the Wicket
Examples at:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/choice
Thanks for the suggestion, that code looks good. However I don't
understand a number of things:
1. where wicket is made aware of the fact that the
1. where wicket is made aware of the fact that the target is actually the
models dropdown and not something else in the form?
I'm not sure I understand this question but I think the answer you're looking
for is: because it has a behavior attached to a component to which you can gain
access to
I wrote:
2. the constructor 'new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange)'
does not seem to exist in Wicket 6. Can I just use the no args
constructor?
Please ignore this one, I was using
AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior instead by mistake.
1. where wicket is made aware of the fact that the target is actually the
models dropdown and not something else in the form?
I'm not sure I understand this question but I think the answer you're
looking for is: because it has a behavior attached to a component to which
you can gain access
In the final HTML, my form is flattened out, there is only Form.
In my Wicket markup, the structure is:
PANEL - FORM - SecondPanel - SecondForm
The main PANEL's FORM is being submitted, and validated. But the
SecondForm validation never gets called.
--
View this message in context:
In the final HTML, my form is flattened out, there is only Form.
That's because Wicket supports nested forms but HTML does not.
Wicket will hide any inner form tags but keep the Form object references.
See section 10.5 Nested Forms of the Wicket Free Guide for more details.
Hi,
Yes, what you are doing is a perfectly ok way to handle this.
Optionally you could use a shared resource for this, but I say that's
just a matter of preference.
We use something inspired by https://code.google.com/p/wicket-rest/
This gives you some abstraction over the json (or xml/...)
Hi Gabriel,
LazyModel implements IPropertyReflectionAwareModel now, so integration
with beanvalidation should work out-of-the-box with the next release.
Best regards
Sven
On 08/13/2013 09:40 PM, Gabriel Landon wrote:
The previous code was flawed. Here's the right one!
It's far from perfect
30 matches
Mail list logo
