Re: [Blog] Surgical DOM updates with Ractive.js

Woa, that is super cool... I was looking for something exactly like this and was thinking of rolling my own for a complex form generation / management framework built on top of wicket! I'll try your integration project very soon and give you me feedback! Cheers, Antoine. -

Re: How to force an ajax channel to await that all other ajax channels are not busy before executing its scheduled callbacks?

Hi Martin, Le 09/08/2013 09:29, Martin Grigorov a écrit : Hi, On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.comwrote: Hi Martin, [...] There is no reason to maintain a copy. All you need is a change in Channel(Manager) so you can extract the current code

How to force an ajax channel to await that all other ajax channels are not busy before executing its scheduled callbacks?

Hi all! In our application, we use two distinct Ajax Channels: - The default one, using the default Queue type - A dedicated channel for what we call actions of type Active All actions use a same class of Behavior that sets the channel in the ajax attributes. What I'd like to achieve is that

Re: How to force an ajax channel to await that all other ajax channels are not busy before executing its scheduled callbacks?

/channels.js as inspiration for unit testing your code. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.comwrote: Hi all! In our application, we use two distinct Ajax Channels: - The default one, using the default Queue type - A dedicated channel for what we call actions

Problem with Ajax submit link in multipartform with dynamic extra parameters

Hi all! I'm using Wicket 6 (both 6.8 and 6.9.1) and am facing an issue when: 1. I have a multipart form 2. This form is submitted via an AjaxSubmitLink (or by any component using an Ajax behavior for submission) 3. The updateAjaxAttributes method of the link is overridden to: 3.1 set

Re: Problem with Ajax submit link in multipartform with dynamic extra parameters

- Clinigrid 92/98 boulevard Victor Hugo 93300 Clichy Cedex Tel: +33 1 55 90 66 84 - Le 07/08/2013 09:47, Martin Grigorov a écrit : Hi, Please create a ticket and attach the quickstart. It is a bug. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.comwrote: Hi all

Re: Wicket 1.4.20 : error message Access denied to (static) package resource

Hi ! I faced a similar issue, but with PDF files used as PackageResource. It boils down to wicket relying now by default on SecurePackageResourceGuard which only authorizes file with some extensions (defined in the SecurePackageResourceGuard constructor). What I did was create my own

Wicket 1.4.14 Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS

Hi all, I have just upgraded my dev environment from Wicket 1.4.13 to 1.4.14 this morning and discovered a bug related to CSS. On a page, I have a panel containing a listview, itself populated with panels that have in their constructor: add(CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(CSS));

Re: Save Data as CSV File

You can use the constructor that takes an IModelFile and pass a LoadableDetachableModel or AbstractReadOnlyModel in which you generate your file. Don't Forget to call setDeleteAfterDowload(true) on your DownloadLink to avoid filling your drive too fast! I do that all the times and as usually

Wicket 1.4.12 and ImageMap deprecated ?

Hello all ! Since i upgraded to Wicket 1.4.12, I noticed that the ImageMap class has been deprecated, and the Javadoc states that its going away in 1.4+ to be replaced by ClientSideImageMap. Unfortunately, the ClientSideImageMap is not present yet! I do not really care about the compilation

Re: Wicket 1.4.12 and ImageMap deprecated ?

to 1.5. If it is possible and there are no objections I'll do it this weekend. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.com wrote: Hello all ! Since i upgraded to Wicket 1.4.12, I noticed that the ImageMap class has been deprecated, and the Javadoc states

Re: It may be basic, but... Globally setting date styles for the application?

-- Antoine Angénieux Associé Clinigrid 5, avenue Mozart 75016 Paris, France +336 60 21 09 18 aangeni...@clinigrid.com Le 1 déc. 2009 à 18:57, Loritsch, Berin C. berin.lorit...@gd- ais.com a écrit : It appears that the newConverterLocator() route is about right, but I have a slight issue

Bug modal.js when wicket in production mode / setStripJavascriptCommentsAndWhitespace(true)

Hi all, I can't tell you from which version it started, but in wicket-1.3 (as from the latest version on SVN), as soon as I do a setStripJavascriptCommentsAndWhitespace(true) or set the wicket mode to production, I get javascript errors in modal.js : (line 64 / 65 of the received javascript)

Re: Bug modal.js when wicket in production mode / setStripJavascriptCommentsAndWhitespace(true)

Fantastic Matej, you're the man ;) Cheers, Antoine. Matej Knopp wrote: Hi, thanks for the report. Should be fixed in SVN. -Matej On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.com wrote: Hi all, I can't tell you from which version it started, but in wicket-1.3

Re: Problem with Wicket Ajax with IE7 64bits

, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.comwrote: Hi Thomas, It is not a javascript error, that's why I don't think Wicket is really the culprit here... It's more like an internal IE error popping up a modal window saying Stack Overflow Error... nothing to do with Java

Problem with Wicket Ajax with IE7 64bits

Hi Wicket users ! I'm encountering a strange error when testing one my webapps (wicket 1.3 latest trunk, but I can reproduce it with wicket 1.3.5) with Internet Explorer 7 64bits version on Vista 64 bits. On some ajax requests, internet explorer fails with a Stack overflow error. This does

Re: Problem with Wicket Ajax with IE7 64bits

, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Antoine Angenieux aangeni...@clinigrid.comwrote: Hi Wicket users ! I'm encountering a strange error when testing one my webapps (wicket 1.3 latest trunk, but I can reproduce it with wicket 1.3.5) with Internet Explorer 7 64bits version on Vista 64 bits. On some ajax

Re: AW: Problem with Wicket Ajax with IE7 64bits

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Antoine Angenieux [mailto:aangeni...@clinigrid.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 16:48 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Problem with Wicket Ajax with IE7 64bits Hi Thomas, It is not a javascript error, that's why I don't think Wicket

Re: Multi-module applications in Wicket

I've had your exact use case a few month ago. I did just what you propose : One War and multiple filter mappings pointing to a different Wicket Application in the same web.xml. Works like a charm ! You still get a separate session for each application, but reuse the same underneath layers...

Re: Modifying the mimetype of the response

Hi Arie, I don't know your usecase, but what I usually do when I need to stream data through wicket, I use a ResourceStreamRequestTarget along with an implementation of AbstractResourceStreamWriter. In your AbstractResourceStreamWriter you can onverride de getContentType() method as :

Re: [OT] wicket users around the world

Paris, France. I'm using Wicket in my company for all our commercial webapps, and it fits perfectly our needs ! Cheers, Antoine. Francis De Brabandere wrote: near Ghent, Belgium companies using wicket: http://www.tvh.com ? http://www.cropdesign.com (internal statistics/reporting website)

Re: What is your experience on the time of development ?

I would not count in how much you gain during your fist devs. with Wicket (even though you STILL gain a lot of time), but how much dev time you gain when reusing your existing Wicket components and how much time you save when you need to maintain your apps ;) Cheers, Antoine. Martin Sachs

Re: What is your experience on the time of development ?

Martin Sachs wrote: Your right ! Already I have developed three Wicket apps (12 month of work for a man), I know how fast i can do thinks with wicket, but i need knowledge of e.g. JSF to say wicket is THE FRAMEWORK for the next big site. Maybe with JSF all things will be developed a lot

Clustering Wicket application for Failover

Hi guys, I need to setup a production environment with failover support. From what I have read in the mailing list, and what I understand of the diskpagestore, the only drawback of setting session replication between 2 tomcat nodes when one of them fails and users are redirected to the

Re: Clustering Wicket application for Failover

what happens is that the latest page is replicated using httpsession and each node stores it into its own diskstore when it is replicated. so everything works and everything is transparent. -igor On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Antoine Angenieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I need

Looking for a Wicket developper in Paris

Hi everyone, Clinigrid is a French ASP company in the medical research field, and is looking for wicket competent developpers with strong Java background. The primary goal is to enhance one of our current product with new functionnalities. A good knowledge of Hibernate / MySQL / Spring

Re: Use wicket page templates not for webapplication

Hi Kan, I've been looking into this problem for some time, and I'm really interested in your solution, if you mind sharing ! As I've seend this kind of thread popup on the mailing list every 6 months or so with no real solution to the problem at hand, maybe you could add it to the Wiki if

Re: Maven QuickStart in Eclipse on Tomcat

Are you, by any chance, using the DevLoader plugin to run Tomcat ? If so, you should go in the tomcat properties of your project, edit the devloader classpath properties, and disable all jetty jars and the servlet-api jar ... Hope this helps, Antoine. insom wrote: I'm trying to run the

Re: TimerTask WICKET

Maybe your browser is caching the image because its URL remains the same. You could add some random noise in your image URL as in NonCachingImage Cheers, Antoine. Francesco Izzi wrote: James Carman ha scritto: Does the image resource know to refresh itself? On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:34 AM,

Re: isVisible vs. setVisible

That's why I almost always override isVisible like @Override boolean isVisible() { return super.isVisible() myVisibilityConstraints; } Thus I can go for both approches (push and / or pull state). Maybe this could be added to the Javadoc of isVisible ? Just my 2 cents, Antoine.