Re: @SpringBean and serialization

2008-09-26 Thread Ari M
all works, and therefore don't feel comfortable updating the wiki. BTW, we appreciate all your efforts. When my workload gets lighter, I definitely plan to contribute to Wicket. :-) Ari igor.vaynberg wrote: > > its a wiki, you can always update it... > > -igor > > On Thu,

Re: @SpringBean and serialization

2008-09-25 Thread Ari M
BTW, I did note that it said "It's possible to have your annotated dependencies automatically injected on construction." By this I inferred that de-/serialization was handled, but it could be made more explicit, as it is for the other approaches. Ari Ari M wrote: > > I se

Re: @SpringBean and serialization

2008-09-25 Thread Ari M
I see nothing on the wiki page under Annotation-based Approach concerning serialization. The other approaches discuss serialization issues, but not this one. Am I missing something? If it said something like "serialization/de-serialization handled automatically", that would be clear. Thanks, A

Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket

2008-06-18 Thread Ari M
Ditto Taranenko's reply. Static type checking is a real boon, and users should remember that using a generified framework is much easier than actually generifying the framework. Once the framework is properly generified, using it is typically quite easy, and clarity is significantly improved. I