Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
>[x] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
> IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
> for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
> for instance) than static type checking.
>
>[x] Wha
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> component.detach() {
> for (field:fields) {
> if (imodel.class.isassignablefrom(field.gettype)) {
> ((imodel)field.get(this)).detach();
> }
> }
> onDetach();
> }
>
+1
I'm also for moving getModel()/getModelObject() out of Component and only
putti
Another difference, if you have to do a database roundtrip (which you will
likely need to verify a password) then the code for the validator is a bit
more complicated. You have to take into account the fact that this gets
serialized/deserialized as part of the page so you can't just pass a DB
conn
ly injecting the validator or making validate an
>> inner/anon class so it can access component's fields.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, James Carman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You can, however, pass in an object obt
I second Matej here... maybe instead of GenericPanel, GenericFragment,
etc. you could name it something more explicit. Some examples:
SingleModelPanel
ModelBoundPanel
It took me the better part of one day to convert a partially genericized
project (we started out with 1.3 then switched to 1.4 mi
add (new Link("edit", person) {
public void onClick () {
setResponsePage (new EditPersonPage (getModel()));
}
});
This code makes a lot more sense if it is inside a repeater...
Rodolfo Hansen-2 wrote:
>
> I too like this compromise alot
>
> Although I don't see a good use case for ge
Hi Dipu,
Thanks for looking into Brix. If you can identify any specific areas where
we could improve our documentation, let us know.
wicket user-2 wrote:
>
> i am very impressed with what i see there,
>
> i had created a simple POC in my company for managing the contents in our
> wicket apps
Is this possible in Wicket, say for example, as a way to scroll down a
listing, or go left and right on a menu?
Thanks in advance...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Callbacks-triggered-by-keyboard...-tf4227815.html#a12027815
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archiv
I noticed this in the examples:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.examples.repeater.AjaxDataTablePage
Changing the sort order does not seem to take you to the first page... I
stepped through the code, and it looks like it should
That was fast :)
Also, while we're on it, I just noticed that the NavigationToolbar text is
off. For a list of 50 items with a pagesize of 5, it says: "Showing 1 to 6
of 50" (should say "Showing 1 to 5 of 50").
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTab
1.3-beta2
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> i believe this was fixed a long time ago, what version are you seeing this
> with?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 8/24/07, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> That was fast :)
>>
>> Also,
vaynberg wrote:
>
> i think it has been fixed since then. at least snapshots at
> wicketstuff.org/wicket13 appear to be working fine.
>
> -igor
>
> On 8/24/07, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1.3-beta2
>>
>>
>>
Added my company to the list.
On 9/18/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 9/18/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be appropriate to add a "Companies Hiring Wicket Developers"
> page? :)
>
Just to add a few things to this list. I took a good look at
JSF/Seam/EJB3/JPA stack about a year ago.
- People say JSF has a rich ecosystem (Trinidad, ICEFaces, MyFaces, SEAM,
Facelets, etc.) but the downside to that is that you won't have one forum to
go to in order to get framework help. Contr
Have you tried private/default scoped setter methods, and would that be an
okay compromise for what you want to do?
lars vonk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I realized that when I have a getter, but no setter for a certain
> property on a Model object for form components it fails with the
> message that i
Does it make sense to have outputMarkupId default to true for FeedbackPanel?
Use case:
somePanel.add (new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
protected void onUpdate (AjaxRequestTarget target) {
// do stuff,
Session.get().info ("did stuff");
target.addChildren (getPage(), FeedbackPanel.class
Wow. Thanks for the heads up. We'll email those guys and let them know of our
project just to make sure we're not working on two very similar things at
once.
jwcarman wrote:
>
> http://blog.playlouder.com/2008/03/11/about-brix/
>
> --
You can use annotations or spring-javaconfig with Spring if you don't want to
go through too much XML configuration. That criticism is really unwarranted
these days. The annotation-style configuration is very similar to how Guice
works, whereas spring-javaconfig is basically like writing the sprin
James,
If you need any CMS functionality at all for your cart project, please have
a look at:
http://brix-cms.googlecode.com/
For example, you could incorporate your cart panels as "tiles" inside of
Brix.
msc65jap wrote:
>
> Is anyone interested in contributing to an open-source e-commerce
>
I don't tend to use models in my pages. I tend to think of Pages as having
more to do with site navigation, as opposed to what is actually displayed in
them... (you would then add genericized panels, like ViewOrderPanel, etc.,
to a page.).
John Patterson wrote:
>
> Yeah guess I will do that. w
Ditto...
http://www.inertiabev.com/inertiabev/page/jobs.jsp
>From the company that brought you Brix CMS.
(http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/)
We are based in Napa, but are willing to consider telecommute.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/job-postings-tp19602122p1990514
We use DateTime/LocalDate in our entities as well. It's easy enough to roll
your own form components.
See the patch and zip file attached to this issue, you can probably just put
those classes in your own project and run with it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-466
The patch is mea
If you want it external to Wicket, you probably want to use a
ServletFilter... something like:
http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
Zach Cox wrote:
>
> I feel dumb for even asking this, as there's got to be an easy way, but my
> brain is blocked today...
>
> I need a URL on my site, say http://mysit
For anyone interested, I've made public yet another quick start application
that brings together Wicket, Spring 2.5 and Hibernate.
The app features a basic CRUD framework based on wicketstuff-crud. The CRUD
framework uses bean annotations to define CRUD properties. It also uses the
excellent InMe
To answer your question, yes spring beans are singleton by default. The
@SpringBean annotation works roughly like this: in your Application class,
you set a ComponentInstantiationListener which gets called every time a
Wicket page/component is instantiated. The particular listener that gets set
(
So long as everything runs in the same webapp, you should be able to use the
same model. From a wicket application, you can always get to the request
object to get to the virtual host, so you can use that info to present a
different view.
Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have one model
Hi Rene,
Some answers...
* What experience do you have regarding performance of wicket applications?
We're still in development, but so far performance hasn't been an issue.
* Is there a way to cluster wicket applications?
Yes. Same way you would cluster any webapp. Wicket also has a number of
+1
(has anyone voted -1 yet?)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
> your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
> easier.
>
> The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
> folks are a
What kind of objects are in the session? Maybe something that's bytecode
instrumented?
Scott Swank wrote:
>
> Seemingly yes. If we write the session to disk, stop the jvm, restart
> the jvm, and then read the session from disk on the same server we
> get this exception.
>
> - Scott
>
>
> O
29 matches
Mail list logo
