Phooey wrote:
>
> I'm unclear of what you actually want here...
>
Actually what I want has been already provided as stated in my previous post
:)
Phooey wrote:
>
> Surely if you use the wicket:enclosure around a tr (something I have
> done in the past) then surely all you need is a little aj
Hi,
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>
> I agree 100% - that's the only clean solution I see.
>
To let you all know - Igor has provided a quick solution and committed it to
a trunk. Now there is overridible Component#renderPlaceholderTag method.
Regards,
Adam
--
View this message in context:
http
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>
> The problem you're facing is clear - and you're right - wicket:enclosure
> won't work for you. Unfortunately, that closed-tag code for the
> placeholder
> is hard-coded in Component.
>
Thanks for understanding :) Also, I've looked already in the Component
source
Thies Edeling-2 wrote:
>
> That's exactly what wicket:enclosure does; otherwise you'd have to wrap
> the
> row in a WebMarkupContainer to keep a reference in the DOM.
>
I know the benefits of wicket:enclosure. What I need, however is a
placeholder, which is what wicket:enclosure doesn't provid
Pills wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure what you need is wicket:enclosure [1] instead
>
That would be the case if I've wanted to hide certain rows forever, unless
I'm largely mistaken. I want to be able to switch the visibility of certain
table rows and since Wicket's AJAX works by replacing given DO
If we have a component with a corresponding markup tag and want to hide
it and display placeholder tag via Component#setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag
the resulting markup will be:
However this is not a valid markup. The proper markup would be:
where x is
the number of columns. Obviously wicket
