Hi all,
if I have a class like this:
class SomeClass {
String getValue(String key);
}
...is there a way I can use a property expression to get values out of this
class? E.g. using an expression like value[myKey].
In other words, something very similar to if the class looked like this:
no you cannot use propertymodel, but you can easily write your own
model that calls the method directly.
-igor
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Jan Stette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
if I have a class like this:
class SomeClass {
String getValue(String key);
}
...is there a way I
Sure. To explain a bit more why I'm asking: I have a table component that's
configured using property expressions as to what's shown in each column.
The types of objects to be shown in the table are not known in advance,
hence having a hard coded model for a specific type of class isn't really
Now thats *really* friendly :-)
On 15 okt 2008, at 13:11, James Carman wrote:
Right, I guess that's what I meant by friendly too. Friendly to
search engines, not just our eyes.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Daan van Etten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keeping keywords in URLs also improves
Hmm...could be. Google shows only one urls [1]
Maybe amazon uses other techniques like robots.txt or the meta-tag
robots to block the other urls. But i didn't look at it.
If you are interested in duplicate content, the google webmaster
central blog has some very nice posts [2] [3].
[1]
Django adds a slug field, which is unique, for its urls. Then you
look up the content by slug instead of id
Its admin interface suggests a slug, which is alterable if it is not unique.
On 10/15/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I didn't find that second URL. I
Hi Hbiloo,
Check out the various UrlCodingStrategies. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/url-coding-strategies.html
I wrote something about RESTful urls here:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-06-20/create-restful-urls-with-wicket
Regards,
Daan
On 15 okt 2008, at 11:19, Azzeddine Daddah wrote:
Hi Hbiloo,
I don't know of an existing working solution. A while ago some people
where working on this, according to the mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
You can prefix the article title with the date (as I did on my blog),
so
Keeping keywords in URLs also improves search engine rankings.
Regards,
Daan
On 15 okt 2008, at 13:01, James Carman wrote:
When Amazon.com does something like this, they still use an id on the
URL. Check out these two URLs (which are equivalent and happen to be
for a book I was suggesting
When Amazon.com does something like this, they still use an id on the
URL. Check out these two URLs (which are equivalent and happen to be
for a book I was suggesting to someone):
http://www.amazon.com/Pragmatic-Version-Control-Using-Subversion/dp/0974514063
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0974514063
Right, I guess that's what I meant by friendly too. Friendly to
search engines, not just our eyes.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Daan van Etten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keeping keywords in URLs also improves search engine rankings.
Regards,
Daan
On 15 okt 2008, at 13:01, James Carman
Hi Daan,
Thanks for your quick response :). It's a really interesting article to
read.
I don't really want to set the ID's of my product in the URL. I was thinking
to do something like this :) :
To be fair, I didn't find that second URL. I hand-crafted it. So,
maybe Amazon doesn't let the search engines find those types of URLs
by crawling. Wouldn't that help?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Witold Czaplewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw...
amazon.com is a very bad example for a
Btw...
amazon.com is a very bad example for a search engine friendly site.
Duplicate content like the posted urls are more problematic than
non-friendly urls.
The perfect solution (unfortunately not always possible) is only one
friendly or meaningful url for every unique page.
Witold
Am Wed, 15
]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hi%2C-question-about-wicket-maven-project-tp19528847p19582777.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
,
does anybody know how to do that?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hi%2C-question-about-wicket
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hi%2C-question-about-wicket-maven-project-tp19528847p19528847.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
The easiest approach is to use Wicket's quickstart and start Start.java
in debug mode in your favorite IDE. With hot code replace and
DEVELOPMENT mode you will have all your changes in .java and resources
files reloaded automatically.
Other options are:
1. use Jetty's Maven plugin (mvn jetty:run)
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-transient-and-serialization-tp18641031p18641031.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-transient-and-serialization-tp18641031p18641031.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
I'm now using Wicket 1.3.3 but I'm still seeing this behavior, where when my
ListView is visited (from Form.loadPersistentFormComponentValues(),) my
listView's children is null when it is visited in
FormComponent.visitFormComponentsPostOrderHelper().
It
I'm now using Wicket 1.3.3 but I'm still seeing this behavior, where when my
ListView is visited (from Form.loadPersistentFormComponentValues(),) my
listView's children is null when it is visited in
FormComponent.visitFormComponentsPostOrderHelper().
It is difficult to understand why the ListView
Just to come back to your original question (as I was intrigued dug into
it), the reason why Wicket didn't find the properties as expected is that
the ResourceModel is relative to the component, so it was looking for
properties such as:
vacancyForm.hrContactPanel.nameLabel.nameLabel=HR
Hello,
I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address, email,
phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have
Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem?
2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component
(wicket panel
,
I have just begun to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address, email,
phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two
to use wicket and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a
component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address,
email,
phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact
and so far I am very impressed with the
framework.
I have a question about best practice to solve a problem. I have a
component
(wicket panel) that contain contact information (like name, address,
email,
phone, etc) and on a specific web page I want to have two of the contact
panels
Hrm. This issue may well be what I've run up against.
When exactly are ListView children created (or reused)?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
Don't forget that I'm using 1.2... this has maybe changed and that's
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
When exactly are ListView children created (or reused)?
Use the source, Luke! onBeforeRender AFAIK.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
Thanks Timo for your very helpful suggestion!
Best Regards,
/Peter
2008/6/11 Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Peter Eriksson wrote:
I will answer my own post, just in case somebody else is looking for a
solution to the same problem. I have found two ways to get the
I'm using Wicket 1.2.
I have a form with several components. Some components are within a
ListView. Cookie value persistence does not appear to be loading values for
components in the ListView. I have a breakpoint in
Form.loadPersistentFormComponentValues(...) at line 261:
if
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
I have a form with several components. Some components are within a
ListView. Cookie value persistence does not appear to be loading values for
components in the ListView. I have a breakpoint in
Form.loadPersistentFormComponentValues(...) at line 261:
Yes, I have.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
I have a form with several components. Some components are within a
ListView. Cookie value persistence does not appear to be loading values
for
components in the
i dont think cookie persistence is going to work for listviews out of
the box. the problem is that components inside repeaters do not have
stable component paths - and that is the key the cookie uses to store
values. so you will need to roll your own solution for this usecase.
-igor
On Tue, Jun
I'm already using cookie names different from the component IDs. It's just
that the components that belong to a ListView are never even checked for
loading.
Where does Wicket discard the ListView components when visiting its child
FormComponents?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Igor Vaynberg
I believe it's because a ListView is not a FormComponent, and the Form only
visits its direct children. Does this sound plausible? How can I work
around this to cause a Form's ListView's children to also be visited?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:37 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
listview rebuilds its components in the beginning of each request.
setreuseitems inhibits that if the same page is redrawn, but if you
change the page the items are not preserved.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:37 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm already using cookie names different
form components inside listview are visited.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:40 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe it's because a ListView is not a FormComponent, and the Form only
visits its direct children. Does this sound plausible? How can I work
around this to cause a
I can't figure out why Wicket is not calling
Form.loadPersisitentFormComponentValues() for FormComponents that belong to
a ListView.
Page.setFormComponentValuesFromCookies() calls visitChildren() inherited
from MarkupContainer. I can see that visitChildren() is called for my
ListView, but it
what calls that method? call hieararchy for it is empty in
eclipse...which is pretty strange...
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:40 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure out why Wicket is not calling
Form.loadPersisitentFormComponentValues() for FormComponents that belong to
a
I'm sorry, which method do you mean?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what calls that method? call hieararchy for it is empty in
eclipse...which is pretty strange...
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:40 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't
Form.loadPersisitentFormComponentValues()
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, which method do you mean?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what calls that method? call hieararchy for it is empty in
That's called from Page.setFormComponentValuesFromCookies(...) which is in
turn called from .renderPage(...)
Don't forget that I'm using 1.2... this has maybe changed and that's why
Eclipse isn't showing the call hierarchy?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
Don't forget that I'm using 1.2... this has maybe changed and that's why
Eclipse isn't showing the call hierarchy?
Before 1.3.0-beta3 there was trouble visiting repeater
children before they are rendered, could your problem be
caused by that?
the sample is greate..it works fine...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hi-all%2C-question-about-invoke-some-other-service-in-wicket-tp17503718p17506079.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
;/div
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-dojo-yahoo-map-in-wicket-tp17506917p17506917.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
the xml format respone,
so that i can get the image location
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hi-all%2C-question-about-invoke-some-other-service-in-wicket-tp17503718p17503718.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
have you had a look at the wicketstuff flickr example integration?
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-flickr/
example is based on wicket 1.2 but it could be an inspiration.
shrimpywu wrote:
hmm..i don`t know here is the right place to post this question
have you had a look at the wicketstuff flickr example integration?
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-flickr/
example is based on wicket 1.2 but it could be an inspiration.
shrimpywu wrote:
hmm..i don`t know here is the right place to post this question
as long as eelco wants to fix it i dont mind
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you think it is a bug, please open a JIRA
issue for it.
didn't we EOL Wicket 1.2.x?
If you think it is a bug, please open a JIRA
issue for it.
didn't we EOL Wicket 1.2.x?
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2008/03/23/wicket-127-the-last-maintenance-release/
Yeah, I actually meant for Wicket 1.3 and up, because the bug is in
there as well.
Eelco
gotcha, thx
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you think it is a bug, please open a JIRA
issue for it.
didn't we EOL Wicket 1.2.x?
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2008/03/23/wicket-127-the-last-maintenance-release/
Yeah, I actually meant
Well I made a new behavior, extending AbstractBehavior implementing
IHeaderContributor. I gave this behavior a reference to the Form that might
have errors, and I added the behavior to the Page on which the Form lives.
In this case, the behavior's renderHead(...) is called as expected.
I'm not
I'm using Wicket 1.2.
I have a Form that implements IHeaderContributor. My intent is to use
renderHead(Response) to write some JavaScript to the response. The Form is
added to the Page. However, renderHead(...) on my Form is never called.
Am I using this interface incorrectly?
Thanks,
Nate
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:28 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can try that I suppose.
The Javadoc for 1.2 seems to mention Component quite a lot though:
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/IHeaderContributor.html
Right. I guess I just lost track of what was
but that wont work ofcourse
you are replacing components.. wicket generates then the html on the server
with the data it then haves.
johan
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm. I've only added the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to the
components that
Can you show us some code?
This should work as long as the component models are updated.
Maurice
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a
named div attached to a WebMarkupContainer. When a
are you sure that all the form elements that are in that div that you
replace have the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior attached?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a
named div attached to a
Hrm. I've only added the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to the
components that cause the visibility of other components to change. The
idea -- and I'm new to Wicket so it may not have been a very good one -- was
to limit server round-trips until a rendering change is required.
I'll add the
I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a
named div attached to a WebMarkupContainer. When a drop-down value changes,
the div is updated via AJAX, re-rendering that part of the form. However,
the components in that part of the form are not updated and so this
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-IAuthorizationStrategy-tp16993036p16993036.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-IAuthorizationStrategy-tp16993036p16993036.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
,
isInstantiationAuthorized(component.getClass())
Been driving me crazy - u'd expect this to be called before instantiation.
I'm curious because it's probably been done for a good reason.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-IAuthorizationStrategy
Fair point :)
I was surprised because it was happening for the HomePage i have, which is
only ever referenced by class (in my app), and comes out of the page factory
- which you do control.
I think you're probably doing the right thing - it would be a nightmare to
handle it differently depending
before instantiation.
I'm curious because it's probably been done for a good reason.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-IAuthorizationStrategy-tp16993036p16995059.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-in-spring%2C-question-about-springinjection-tp16895558p16895558.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the real code, as it seems strange to modify
it so the test can run.
Hope that someone could understand what the problem is and help me :-(
Thanks in advance,
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WicketTester-in-spring%2C-question-about-springinjection
code, as it seems strange to modify
it so the test can run.
Hope that someone could understand what the problem is and help me :-(
Thanks in advance,
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WicketTester-in-spring%2C-question-about-springinjection
take a look at the wicket blog tutorial:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/blog-tutorial.html
Or even better the wicket-persistence-template:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-persistence-template
Sarkast wrote:
Hello there,
I have a question which
() {
protected void addSpringInitializer() {
// don't do anything
}
};
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WicketTester-in-spring%2C-question-about-springinjection-tp16895558p16896589.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Thanks, much more elegant then what I came up with. (novice programmer -.-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WicketTester-in-spring%2C-question-about-springinjection-tp16895558p16896956.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-StringResourceLoader-tp15888948p16831749.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
That is easy. Use getLocalizer.getString(key, City.class, new Model(obj)).
You can not do this in the constructor of your component though. There
are 2 workaround: 1) create a model (for example by subclassing
AbstractReadOnlyModel), 2) override the method onBeforeRender in your
component.
Hello,
I have a question about modal window. When I click the [x] button in the
modal window, two methods were called namely CloseButtonCallback and
WindowClosedCallback and when I called window.close(target) only
WindowClosedCallback clled.I think this is default behavior. But I want to
call
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, tsuresh wrote:
When I click on the next name the output is User selected: Bob. i.e. The
first output comes in second click and second ouput comes in third click
and so on. My code is as shown below: Where am I missing ? Please help.
String username =;
Link
or even better, it should really be something like this
class deleteuserlink extends link {
protected void oncomponenttag(tag) {
string uname=((user)getmodelobject()).getusername();
tag.put(onclick, return alert('are you sure you want to
delete +uname.
}
}
and in your code
, return
alert('User selected: +username + ');));
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15997606.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick,
return alert('User selected: +username + ');));
thanks
I solved it using modal window,but still couldnot do it in popup javascript.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15998027.html
to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15950581.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
selectedName = user1;
deleteLink.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onclick, return confirm('Are
you sure to delete?');));
I am not able to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question
?');));
I am not able to append this selectedName after: Are you sure to delete
How to append this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simple-question-about-alert-string-tp15950581p15950760.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
obvious if this
can be achieved with inbuilt wicket objects.
I can use the IStringResourceLoader and write something myself, or...
perhaps I'm overlooking something.
Can someone shed some light please?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-StringResourceLoader
]
-
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-About-Locale-tp15076727p15082988.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Jan 24, 2008 2:33 PM, Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer who has requested the ability to view multiple
locales on a page. It looks like I can do this fine with Wicket
through the use of properties files,
Probably combined with overriding getLocale of component for
you have to program that yourself.
that is not somethign wicket or a framework can do
On Jan 25, 2008 3:40 PM, Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/25/08, Michael Sparer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steve,
wicket by default checks the user's locale (i.e. the locale of the
session)
On 1/25/08, Michael Sparer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steve,
wicket by default checks the user's locale (i.e. the locale of the session)
and looks for matching files. e.g. if your user accesses Foo.html with the
german locale de wicket checks whether there is a Foo_de.html (and/or
I have a customer who has requested the ability to view multiple
locales on a page. It looks like I can do this fine with Wicket
through the use of properties files, but what I would like to do is
automatically detect which locales there are properties files for. Is
this possible, and if so,
to ignore or somehow escape the colon in the
attribute name...and still process it?
I tried using slash in front of it and it didn't work...any suggestions,
please help.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket%3Amessage-tp14326982p14326982.html
Sent from
in front of it and it didn't work...any suggestions,
please help.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket%3Amessage-tp14326982p14326982.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Java Programmer wrote:
Is there any simple way to generate javascripts to validate forms
against validation rules provided by Wicket Validators e.g.
RequiredValidator? I have on mind client side validators to check is
fields not empty, or provided passwords match. For now
I agree that is is nice to have the simple field validation done in
javascript on the client side. But this is an add on, the same
validation has still to be done on the server anyway.
But in the further we could have some validations that also contribute
some javascript to the output which does
Thank you for the answers, I agree that server side validation is more
important, from e.g. security reasons, but if you make something we
called now Web 2.0 application is nice to have also client side
validations scripts. So I can check if login is free to use via Ajax,
but checking if password
Hello,
Is there any simple way to generate javascripts to validate forms
against validation rules provided by Wicket Validators e.g.
RequiredValidator? I have on mind client side validators to check is
fields not empty, or provided passwords match. For now I see that Ajax
support is great, but
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-JavaScript-validation-tf4861904.html#a13918947
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Turns out I had a listview on the page which was generating new versions
of the page. Setting setReuseItems(true) solved the versioning problem.
(Which was basically the only real problem I was having).
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply!
Actually, in
If the page is stateless, why are you using hybrid url coding strategy
for it? You should just mount it.
Also, even more important thing, is the page really stateless?
Stateless pages don't have versions.
Link is not a stateless component so if you use it on a page, it will
make it statefull.
As
Hi,
Thanks for the reply!
Actually, in some cases the page is not stateless all the time (which is
why I use that strategy), i.e. it starts out on a stateless form.
Another reason why I use it on non-stateless pages is because the URL
looks so much better. ;-)
Anyway, I do use Link, so yes
/Question-about-Guice-integration-with-Wicket-1.3-beta-4-tf4778901.html#a13671501
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
pmularien wrote:
Was there a conscious design decision to not use the
org.apache.wicket.injection.web.InjectorHolder class (and, by association,
have the wicket-guice stuff inherit from ConfigurableInjector)? It would be
pretty convenient if the GuiceComponentInjector worked similarly to the
201 - 300 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
