What's the meaning you want to attach to the missing generic parameter?
Best,
Ernesto
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kurt Zitze g...@gmx.net wrote:
hey,
why does the panel is not using generics for type safety?
regards
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla
i want the getModelObject() (which is in fact the getDefaultModelObject()) to
return the actual type that i dont need to do unchecked casts. i'm just
wondering, now that everything uses generics, why does the panel do not use
generics? just want to understand the reason behind this.
regards
garz
: garz [mailto:g...@gmx.net]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. September 2009 13:24
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Panel not using generics
i want the getModelObject() (which is in fact the getDefaultModelObject()) to
return the actual type that i dont need to do unchecked casts. i'm just
wondering
The main point I could object is that you might have panels that are not
associated to a model... and then you will still have to pass a model
object type to avoid unchecked warnings... I know I could always use
PanelVoid, or PanelObject, but as a user I would not like to be forced
to do that all
: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:58 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Panel not using generics
The main point I could object is that you might have panels that are not
associated to a model... and then you will still have to pass a model
object type to avoid unchecked warnings... I know I