On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jeffrey Schneller
wrote:
> Also how would one move the configuration of the jdbc connection to
> code? It is desirable to db connection information reside at the server
> level so when deploying code from dev to stage to production, you do not
> need change or re
I'm not sure the purpose of the interceptor, but until you have a need
to extend and use it, you can use the org.hibernate.EmptyInterceptor
class instead of creating your own. I have had no problems with using
that class.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Schneller [mailto:jeffrey.schnel..
The interceptor can be safely removed. It was necessary for the
project I was working on, but you probably don't need it.
JDBC connection settings are best done through a DataSource and
specified at the container level instead of programmatically.
Martijn
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Jeffrey
The interceptor can be safely removed. It was necessary for the
project I was working on, but you probably don't need it.
JDBC connection settings are best done through a DataSource and
specified at the container level instead of programmatically.
Martijn
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Jeffrey
