Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my understanding
is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to another
component, why not just have that component also use an annotation? I
wouldn't think that
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my
understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to another
component, why not just have
to doing
that, but I was also intersted out of curiosity.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations
Although I do not know
/ Spring bean annotations
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my
understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to another
component, why not just have that component also use an annotation
...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my
understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized.
However, I would ask
