On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Antoine van Wel
> wrote:
>>
>> Since "you can't always have what you want"..
>>
>> Is there any PHP framework out there which comes even close to Wicket;
>> component based, strict separation between HTML
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Antoine van Wel
wrote:
> Since "you can't always have what you want"..
>
> Is there any PHP framework out there which comes even close to Wicket;
> component based, strict separation between HTML and programming,
> stateful, out-of-the-box Ajax support, event handli
I don't think you are going to get all that from a PHP-based framework.
I have used CakePHP, which is sorta Rails-like, for production projects.
It's pretty nifty and has good community support.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/preferred-php-framework-by
> Sadly reality is that PHP is more widely adopted. Apache comes almost
> by default with PHP. So I was wondering, does anything come close to
> Wicket, to ease the pain.. Or to have a stronger case for Wicket in
> discussions.
Do you know Zeta Components which entered the apache incubator for a w
Now wait a moment, let me be very clear that I prefer Wicket .. I
don't want misunderstandings about that ;-)
Sadly reality is that PHP is more widely adopted. Apache comes almost
by default with PHP. So I was wondering, does anything come close to
Wicket, to ease the pain.. Or to have a stronger
2011/3/8 Josh Kamau :
> I dont know of any. If you prefer scripting languages, there is a
> scala+wicket integration. Just google it if you are interested.
I would not call scala a scripting language. It is a statically typed,
compiled JVM language. It's a scripting language in the same sense
Java
I dont know of any. If you prefer scripting languages, there is a
scala+wicket integration. Just google it if you are interested.
Josh.
+1 for Symfony, probably as good as you can get for PHP. But no, it
won't work like wicket. Afaik there are no stateful PHP frameworks out
there (but I could be wrong).
/Robert
On 03/08/2011 01:30 PM, Martin Makundi wrote:
Sorry..not close but far...maybe I meant keep enemies closer ;)
**
Ma
Sorry..not close but far...maybe I meant keep enemies closer ;)
**
Martin
2011/3/8 Martin Makundi :
> Hmm.. I would personally stay as close as possible from non statically
> typed languages ;)
>
> Ofcourse it depends on what you are making, if it is worth making and
> so forth ;)
>
> **
> Martin
Hmm.. I would personally stay as close as possible from non statically
typed languages ;)
Ofcourse it depends on what you are making, if it is worth making and
so forth ;)
**
Martin
2011/3/8 Antoine van Wel :
> Since "you can't always have what you want"..
>
> Is there any PHP framework out ther
10 matches
Mail list logo
