this has already been done, its a bit too late for -1 votes. the
thread was started aug 11.
-igor
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, James Carman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver
> wrote:
>> And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email
>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote:
> And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email
> instead of posting to the public list, would you not? :)
>
No, because I would want their reply to go to the list. The -1 should
be taken seriously if it ha
> A -1 vote would be a vote against dropping support. You seem to be
> making
> an argument for dropping it. Plus it wasn't your -1, was it?
Ah, then I misunderstood. Was a bit early in the morning I guess.
And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email
instead of
A -1 vote would be a vote against dropping support. You seem to be making
an argument for dropping it. Plus it wasn't your -1, was it?
On Sep 2, 2010 3:41 AM, "Wilhelmsen Tor Iver" wrote:
>> Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
>> them to be considered seriously
> Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
> them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1?
Moving portlet support to a separate project (instead of core or extensions)
makes more sense, that is at least one justification.
(I guess this would in effect be
Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Paul Szulc wrote:
> -1
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just created a ticket (https://issu
-1
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976
> )
> to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5.
> It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request
> processing.
> Sinc
Hi,
-1 to removing it
We are using Wicket and portlets in many projects.
At a minimum move it to wicketstuff.
thanks,
José Antonio Matute
Hi,
With r985443 the support for portlets is completely removed.
The code is copied to
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-portlets
.
Check the list of modified files in the commit to see which other files in
Wicket are modified.
To bring the wicketstuff proj
> So next step is someone with experience in portlets to try to create a
> separate project with the classes
> from org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.portlet and whatever else is
> needed.
Probably mostly a WicketPortletFilter to be used in front of WicketFilter that
builds on the portlet-oriented
Ok, we have 1.5-M1 released.
So next step is someone with experience in portlets to try to create a
separate project with the classes
from org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.portlet and whatever else is needed.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Nick Heudecker wrote:
> 0, non-committed. There seems to
0, non-committed. There seems to be some interest here. Hopefully the
community supports it in wicketstuff. +1 non-committed to moving to
wicketstuff.
On Aug 11, 2010 11:18 PM, "Steve Swinsburg"
wrote:
-1 to removing it
As soon as uPortal supports JSR-286 (and it does, just not in a release yet
-1 to removing it
As soon as uPortal supports JSR-286 (and it does, just not in a release yet)
I'll be using Wicket for my portlet development and have been training my team
in readiness.
At a minimum move it to wicketstuff.
thanks,
Steve
On 12/08/2010, at 5:19 AM, Rodolfo Hansen wrote:
> I
I used wikcet 1.4 inside Liferay 5.2 and sent a tiny patch that was
implemented in 1.4.7
I no longer use wicket inside a portlet container, but I can help
support it.
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:45 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other
I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other
person out there with the will and means to take the project on, they
can do so.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976)
> t
Hi,
I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976)
to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5.
It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request
processing.
Since none of the active core developers use this technology in his daily
job it i
16 matches
Mail list logo
