James
Thanks mate. I have couple of options i guess that is what pedro meant as
well. I guess Jeremy's solution is what i was looking for. in that the form
instance will have a CPM that refers a container bean that has members.
The solution u provided also is the identical but the members are in a
HI Pedro
Thanks for taking the time. I really appreaciate this community and love it.
What Jeremy mentioned provided the solution where in the we let wicket use
the hierarchy to use the model class that contains other beans and
introspect the property expression and set/get values. That way the pa
You could put your components for editing the two different objects
onto two different panels, which each have a CPM inside your form.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj wrote:
> Thanks. How do i let the form know that it has one or more models? In the
> above I invoke the
> super(i
Hi Nivedan, Jeremy write " IModel as a private variable" and James
"Your form can edit two different objects. It will edit whatever you bind
your fields to"
If you have an form with some fields for some bean, and other fields for
other beans, you can do something like:
class panel {
private m
Hi Jeremy,
Nice I follow you now. I can have a container java class and have any number
of member variables which in turn can be a hibernate entity and a regular
java bean. The container java class will be the model. And on detach; i
would have to have the container java class extend IModel and imp
Either create a model object that contains your study and foo objects, or
hold an IModel as a private variable. Remember it's just regular java,
so you can use member variables. Just don't forget to detach any model you
hold as a variable manually.
Jeremy Thomerson
-- sent from my smartphone - ple
Thanks. How do i let the form know that it has one or more models? In the
above I invoke the
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(study)); So this wraps the model
as study. How will be able to add the second model in the same manner?
If it sounds too basic do bear with me I will experiment as well.
Your form can edit two different objects. It will edit whatever you bind
your fields to
On Jul 16, 2010 4:23 AM, "Nivedan Nadaraj" wrote:
> Hi
> Thanks for the pointer. I did read through models and
> LoadableDetachableModel. Not sure if this model addresses the problem at
> hand. Isn't LDM rel
Hi
Thanks for the pointer. I did read through models and
LoadableDetachableModel. Not sure if this model addresses the problem at
hand. Isn't LDM related to performance and resoles
Serialization issues? In the same note I came across Chaining of models. or
Nesting of Models...can you/someone give m
see org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Re-Wicket-s-Form-Model-using-hibernate-entity-or-value-objects-Design-tp2289854p2289870.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hi All
I use Wicket with Hibernate. I have used the hibernate entity as a Form's
Model.Now however I noticed that I need to also add/update an LDAP
instance's entries.This means as part of my submit
Ineed to wicket to capture the non-entity properties also.
1. I either have to use a Value Object a
11 matches
Mail list logo
