Hi,
I haven't seen async processing in real-life yet, so I can't really
comment on its usefulness.
> my very first idea was to be able to serve more request with the same
thread count
Most examples I've found just move processing to a different thread - as
I have done it in my example too
Hi,
Thank you for your code, I gave it a try and looked at it closer, and I'm
ont sure it feets a real need, well at least mine : it delegates the answer
to another thread, so it's as if we add a worker thread to the container,
kind of machine load. It is not what I expected : my very first idea w
jtp?type=node&node=4677129&i=2>
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-8-and-
servlet-3-1-async-nio-tp4677098p4677129.html
To unsubscribe from Wicket 8 and se
t; <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4677129&i=2>
> >
> >
>
>
> ------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-8-and-
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:50 AM, guillaume.mary
wrote:
> Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
>
Welcome!
Now I think there might be a way to implement my use case!
In onClick() the application code can suspend the current thread, start the
slow operation and setup onComplete listeners.
Custom listen
Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-8-and-servlet-3-1-async-nio-tp4677098p4677128.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:29 PM, guillaume.mary
wrote:
> Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:41 PM, guillaume.mary <
>
> > guiom.mary@
>
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Did I miss something ? if not is there anything planned a
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:41 PM, guillaume.mary <
> guiom.mary@
> >
> wrote:
>
>> Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Did I miss something ? if not is there anything planned about async IO
>> in
>> >> Wicket 8 ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > There is no planned support
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:41 PM, guillaume.mary
wrote:
> Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> >>
> >> Did I miss something ? if not is there anything planned about async IO
> in
> >> Wicket 8 ?
> >>
> >
> > There is no planned support for asynchronous pages for Wicket 8!
>
> Is there some techni
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Did I miss something ? if not is there anything planned about async IO in
>> Wicket 8 ?
>>
>
> There is no planned support for asynchronous pages for Wicket 8!
Is there some technical (known) reason ? Or just because of roadmap decision
?
I mean, if i have s
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:37 AM, guillaume.mary
wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> I had a look at the future Wicket 8 and I saw that the servlet 3.1 was the
> target. So I looked a little bit at the code and I didn't see anything
> about
> async IO usage. I was looking for some code that looks like th
Hi there !
I had a look at the future Wicket 8 and I saw that the servlet 3.1 was the
target. So I looked a little bit at the code and I didn't see anything about
async IO usage. I was looking for some code that looks like the recommended
one by Oracle
(http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/
12 matches
Mail list logo
