On 8/29/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let me just say I'm very very glad I don't have to develop
> the site I'm working on using Perl. :)
yeah, but if you did youd have it done in 1/10th the time. it can probably
all fit in a single file too.
-igor
Eelco
>
> --
On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over in the Slashdot article about "GWT in Action" there are some negative
> opinions toward Wicket expressed. Just thought I'd mention it in case any
> of the gurus want to weigh in too. (Head over to this link, set the
> threshold to 4,
subscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-getting-some-bad-press-at-Slashdot.org-tf4350622.html#a12396633
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Yeah, we have alrady seen it. But I personally think that responding to
arguments such as "I just don't see what Wicket - or possibly any web
framework - buys you." is just a waste of time.
-Matej
On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Over in the Slashdot article about "GWT
Over in the Slashdot article about "GWT in Action" there are some negative
opinions toward Wicket expressed. Just thought I'd mention it in case any
of the gurus want to weigh in too. (Head over to this link, set the
threshold to 4, then search for "Wicket",
http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?s
