Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
version 2.6.
Do not upgrade to this maven-eclipse-plugin version if you intend to
keep on working with your wicket projects in the way Wicket Intended.
Always spe
That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts
the files were you want them?
- Brill Pappin
On 2-Apr-09, at 6:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/jav
Why fix something that isn't broken?
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts the
> files were you want them?
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
> On 2-Apr-09, at 6:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
>> Some brilliant guy t
copy code from the eclipse plugin to wicket eclipse plugin.. And
everybodys happy :)
2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
> Why fix something that isn't broken?
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
>> That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts the
>>
I won't be... then I have to maintain the wicket-eclipse-maven plugin.
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, nino martinez wael
wrote:
> copy code from the eclipse plugin to wicket eclipse plugin.. And
> everybodys happy :)
>
> 2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
>> Why fix something that isn't broken
does it add excludes to the source folder settings?
-igor
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
> only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
> version 2.6.
>
> Do not upgrade to this m
Hmm, just because you start something you have to maintain it the rest
of the life? OMG :(
2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
> I won't be... then I have to maintain the wicket-eclipse-maven plugin.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, nino martinez wael
> wrote:
>> copy code from the eclipse
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
> only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
> version 2.6.
Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
Cheers
Philippe
---
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
Yes, but it's not specifically "illegal" in the maven world to put
non-java files in there (didn't we have this argument a few days ago).
-
Someone needs to start a facebook group and protest this change.
Ryan Gravener
http://ryangravener.com/flex | http://twitter.com/ryangravener
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> > Well there's a reason these folders
New Facebook group: "I'll bet I can get 1 million people to bitch
about where resources should go in maven"
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ryan Gravener wrote:
> Someone needs to start a facebook group and protest this change.
>
> Ryan Gravener
> http://ryangravener.com/flex | http://twitter.com
Looks like we have to wait for 2.6.1 or 2.7
"Known Issues:
* [MECLIPSE-443] - Only include **/*.java in Java source directories
may affect you if you use ajdt or have non-java sources in your
directories that you expect to be compiled
Release 2.6.1 (which may get renamed to 2.7) has fixed this i
James Carman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
>
> Yes, but it's not specifically "illegal" in the maven world to put
> non-java files in there (didn't we have this argument a few days ago).
You simply rel
Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> You simply relied on a bug / undocumented featured. Move your resources
> where the belong into the resources folder.
>
> Cheers
>
i just want to say one quick thing about this.
there are two great things about maven
1) it established a convention that eliminated a lot of boilerplate
2) it does not force the convention - everything can be overridden and
customized by configuring plugins
once the authors of maven and or plugi
Ahh really? But i want to!!!
Can i? Can i???
On 02/04/2009, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
>> You simply relied on a bug /
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
>
+1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket
>
> Ahh really? But i want to!!!
> Can i? Can i???
>
I've been busy for a while... so I want to! :P
Yes, I'm coming back... Run for your lives ;-)
Bruno Borges
blog.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it
Maybe I misread your post, but I thought you were saying that it
messes up where you want you meta files and forces you to use the
"maven" resource pattern?
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 9:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Why fix something that isn't broken?
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 P
laugh
not again! ;)
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-
plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
version 2.6.
Well there's a reason these folder
laugh
Although I think its too late to stop this thread growing, you should
all know that we just had this argument a few weeks ago!
It seems to be a touchy subject for some :)
The old thread can be found by searching for "Re: How can I share text
resources with multiple web applications?".
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> failure to accommodate other
> resource usage patterns).
HUH?
Care to elaborate? Wicket doesn't force its patterns upon you (unlike
maven's eclipse 2.6 plugin). You are free to add your
html/properties/etc in src/main/resources without ever t
I think thats a good position.
I can't image that it was purposely done in order to enforce the maven
way, there are just too many people who would have broken builds.
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 3:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i just want to say one quick thing about this.
there are two great
*sigh*
I was referring to the suggestion that there be an option in the
archetype, and the disparaging thread that ensued.
However, I don't want to argue about this *again*.
...never mind...
- Brill
On 3-Apr-09, at 9:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pap
FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Just add the following to your pom.xml:
maven-eclipse-plugin
2.5.1
We did it in our parent POM and it's working fine.
jk
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Brill Pappin wro
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Yes - use IDEA! :-)
/Gwyn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:21:13PM +0100, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> > FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
What, haven't they "fixed" the maven-idea-plugin yet? Your time's
comin', pal! :
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
+1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user
What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>>
>> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
> +1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
---
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Martijn Reuvers
wrote:
> What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
>
We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
and he never gets anything done.
> We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
> anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
> and he never gets anything done.
Hehe if you generate say getters and setters for 20 fields with an
IDE, or type them all out instead - you have to type extreme
John, thanks for sharing this. It worked for me with the update from
Maven 2.0.9 to 2.1.0 on MacOS X.
Kaspar
On 03.04.2009, at 16:42, John Krasnay wrote:
FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Just add the following to your pom.xml:
maven-ec
32 matches
Mail list logo
