Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-11-08 Thread Michael Sparer
s (not >> >> sure >> >> >> if >> >> >> > it's used in production or not). For the IPushService >> >> implementation, >> >> >> it >> >> >> > still requires more testing and improvements, because the

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-11-08 Thread Xavier Hanin
gt; > plan to use it, do not forget to do an svn update. > >> >> > > >> >> > Xavier > >> >> > > >> >> > thanks in advance > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Michael > >> >> >> > >&

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-11-06 Thread Michael Sparer
change for the IPushService. >> If >> >> you >> >> > plan to use it, do not forget to do an svn update. >> >> > >> >> > Xavier >> &g

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-25 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/22/07, Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> today I wondered if there's a wicket-approach for pushing > messages >

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-25 Thread Michael Sparer
users >> >> >> --> I'd need a ChannelService only for two users. So my question >> is: >> >> >> what's >> >> >> the wicket way to pass and store such an object which is applicable >> >> only >> >> >> for >

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-24 Thread Xavier Hanin
hannelService that delivers the messages to its listeners, is > stored > >> in > >> >> the > >> >> application. I.e. there is only one channel for the whole > application. > >> >> Now imagine I want to

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-24 Thread Michael Sparer
>> Now imagine I want to create an additional private-chat-room for two >> >> users >> >> --> I'd need a ChannelService only for two users. So my question is: >> >> what's >> >> the wicket way to pass and store such an obje

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-23 Thread Xavier Hanin
gt; users > >> --> I'd need a ChannelService only for two users. So my question is: > >> what's > >> the wicket way to pass and store such an object which is applicable > only > >> for > >> two users (sessions)? > > > > > &

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Sparer
#x27;s >> the wicket way to pass and store such an object which is applicable only >> for >> two users (sessions)? > > > You can use an application wide ChannelService and use the channel name > ("chat/message" in the example) to isolate messages by private-chat-

Re: wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-22 Thread Xavier Hanin
can use an application wide ChannelService and use the channel name ("chat/message" in the example) to isolate messages by private-chat-room. Xavier Thanks in advance > > Michael > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-and-s

wicketstuff push and sharing an IChannelService

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Sparer
users. So my question is: what's the wicket way to pass and store such an object which is applicable only for two users (sessions)? Thanks in advance Michael -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-and-sharing-an-IChannelService-tf4671463.html#a13345278 Sent from