Le 03/11/10 09:57, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
But my point of view is -1 stepping the release
Hi,
Just want to share my thought, I've worked for 15 years in the software
domain, and I'm used to release numbers.
For me, a 3.0 release is not stable.
Have a nice day.
Maxime
2010/11/4 Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com
Le 03/11/10 09:57, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM,
I have not been in the industry as long as some here, nor have I worked on as
many projects, etc, but I have been a long time user of software, and well
as written my own.
The way I see things are (Major Revision).(Minor Revision).(Fix) there are
sometimes different schema perhaps for daily
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
But my point of view is -1 stepping the release family number because the
main purpose of
Hi!
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
But my point of view is -1 stepping the release family
[Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
Hi!
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
But my
