I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2003
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Thanks for replying it. I'll make a PR for doing it.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Prabhjyot Singh <
> prabhjyotsi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> Yes, agreed I too t
Thanks for replying it. I'll make a PR for doing it.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Prabhjyot Singh
wrote:
> +1.
>
> Yes, agreed I too think its overhead, and all the features can be achieved
> via JDBCInterpreter.
>
> On 23 January 2017 at 10:45, Jongyoul Lee wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We, cu
+1.
Yes, agreed I too think its overhead, and all the features can be achieved
via JDBCInterpreter.
On 23 January 2017 at 10:45, Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We, currently, have two kind of Interpreter supporting to connect DB which
> are PostgresqlInterpreter and JDBCInterpreter. In histo
Hi all,
We, currently, have two kind of Interpreter supporting to connect DB which
are PostgresqlInterpreter and JDBCInterpreter. In history, JDBCInterpreter
is based on PostgresqlInterpeter and has the same function with it. I
suggest to remove PostgrsqlInterpreter in Zeppelin's code base because
