Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote: Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0 version? I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 2.0 specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation Also, it's clearly not production

RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Sriram Krishnan
>>Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0 version? I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 2.0 specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation Thanks, Sriram From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Swaroop C H
On Apr 1, 2005 3:19 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy. I think 'ironpython' is the best choice. I don't believe that an extra 4 characters is going to make such a big difference. Having the command line name and the soft

Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Muhammad Abubakar
every time I read ironpy my mind recalls "american pie" movie :). But its cool name. Ab. On Apr 1, 2005 2:49 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that > there were zero votes for keeping the name as is . > > The two names

RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Thane
I think it would be nice to have "Python" in the name. Imagine the book title: "Programming in ___" A. IronPythonConsole B. FePy C. IronPy D. IronPython Choice "D" gets my vote - it's not too hard to ty

[IronPython] Re: Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Michael Spencer
Brian Almond wrote: Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-) The name doesn't matter much to me - I rarely invoke the console directly - but my reaction to ironpy was the same as Google's: Did you mean: irony. I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly. +1 Micha

RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread R.R. Sprinkhuizen
> Personally, I like ironpy.  I too was a little late in voting ;-)Count me in. I don't like fepy.> I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0 version?Cheers!Reginald SwitchBL8's gebazel ___

Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Brian Almond
Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-) I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly. (Jim - I meant to send this to the list the first time around not direct to you, oops.) On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for

Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Anthony Tarlano wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that there were zero votes for keeping the name as is . The two names that had votes in favor of the

Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Anthony Tarlano
Jim, Sorry I didn't get my vote in before you close the ballot.. But I do what to register my vote for ipython Btw, that's what I have named the console already and it is natural for me to continue to type python with just a leading i Give it a try, I think you may like it.. Anthony On T

[IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-03-31 Thread Jim Hugunin
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that there were zero votes for keeping the name as is . The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy. There were a few more of you in favor of fepy than ironpy for that science geek charm; however, I didn't not