On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote:
Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and
a 2.0
version?
I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of
2.0
specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation
Also, it's clearly not production
>>Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0
version?
I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 2.0
specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation
Thanks,
Sriram
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
On Apr 1, 2005 3:19 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
I think 'ironpython' is the best choice. I don't believe that an extra
4 characters is going to make such a big difference. Having the
command line name and the soft
every time I read ironpy my mind recalls "american pie" movie :). But
its cool name.
Ab.
On Apr 1, 2005 2:49 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
> there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
>
> The two names
I think it would be nice to have "Python" in the name.
Imagine the book title:
"Programming in ___"
A. IronPythonConsole
B. FePy
C. IronPy
D. IronPython
Choice "D" gets my vote - it's not too hard to ty
Brian Almond wrote:
Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
The name doesn't matter much to me - I rarely invoke the console directly - but
my reaction to ironpy was the same as Google's: Did you mean: irony.
I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.
+1
Micha
> Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in
voting ;-)Count me in. I don't like fepy.> I'm happy we're
getting new releases at all, frankly.Me too, but very unhappy that it
needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0
version?Cheers!Reginald
SwitchBL8's
gebazel
___
Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.
(Jim - I meant to send this to the list the first time around not
direct to you, oops.)
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for
On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Anthony Tarlano wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice
that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of the
Jim,
Sorry I didn't get my vote in before you close the ballot.. But I do
what to register my vote for ipython
Btw, that's what I have named the console already and it is natural
for me to continue to type python with just a leading i Give it a
try, I think you may like it..
Anthony
On T
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
There were a few more of you in favor of fepy than ironpy for that
science geek charm; however, I didn't not
11 matches
Mail list logo
