+1 for fepy
I think it would be good to have a web-based poll (using NSurvey :-) )
and close this topic.
On Apr 1, 2005 4:45 AM, Richard Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for ironpy
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:46:35 +0200, R.R. Sprinkhuizen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Persona
+1 for ironpy
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:46:35 +0200, R.R. Sprinkhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
>
> Count me in. I don't like fepy.
>
> > I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.
>
> Me too, but very unhapp
Already taken
--
Keith J. Farmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thuban.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anthony Tarlano
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:12 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Renaming
pril 2005 3:47
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole
>
> I don't know why you're whining about it anyway. 2.0 is faster and better,
> and (unlike previous technologies inflicted upon us by MS) it won't cause
> any troub
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.
Merrill
Sent: zondag 3 april 2005 3:47
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole
I don't know why you're whining about it anyway. 2.0 is faster and better,
and (unlike previous technologies inflicted upo
I don't know why you're whining about it anyway. 2.0 is faster and better, and
(unlike previous technologies inflicted upon us by MS) it won't cause any
trouble to have both 2.0 and earlier versions on the same machine at the same
time.
At 05:04 PM 4/1/2005, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote
>> If you
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:04:45AM +0200, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote:
>
> > If you liked it better with the old license and old requirements, fork the
> old one.
>
> If I had that kind of programming capabilities, I wouldn't be here whining
> about 2.0, now would I?
So put up some money to have som
> If you liked it better with the old license and old requirements, fork the
old one.
If I had that kind of programming capabilities, I wouldn't be here whining
about 2.0, now would I?
Cheers!
Reginald
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ir
On Apr 1, 2005, at 15:31, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote:
I guess you're right: by the time IronPython (or whatever the name
will be)
is production ready, everybody will have 2.0 on their machine. Right? I
guess it's just another Microsoft way of saying: you must upgrade to
2.0. I
don't like that tone.
n of .NET and I liked
the way that IronPython *was* licensed.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Ippolito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 1 april 2005 6:48
To: Sriram Krishnan
Cc: 'R.R. Sprinkhuizen'; users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Renaming Iron
I take back my vote for ipython and throw my entire one vote behind nython...
"Programming in Nython" ...
Anthony
On Apr 1, 2005 6:17 PM, Terry L. Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Jim Hugunin wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback o
On Friday 01 April 2005 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Hugunin wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
> > there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
> >
> > The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
Not to contribu
Jim Hugunin wrote:
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
ironpy is very like irony, so maybe pirony would be better?
More seriously how about piron
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote:
Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and
a 2.0
version?
I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of
2.0
specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation
Also, it's clearly not production
OTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.R.
Sprinkhuizen
Sent: 01 April 2005 04:17
To: users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole
> Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
Count me in. I don't like
On Apr 1, 2005 3:19 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
I think 'ironpython' is the best choice. I don't believe that an extra
4 characters is going to make such a big difference. Having the
command line name and the soft
every time I read ironpy my mind recalls "american pie" movie :). But
its cool name.
Ab.
On Apr 1, 2005 2:49 AM, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
> there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
>
> The two names
simple and clear as
reasonably possible.
--Thane
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Tarlano
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:57 PM
> To: Jim Hugunin
> Cc: users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython
> Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in
voting ;-)Count me in. I don't like fepy.> I'm happy we're
getting new releases at all, frankly.Me too, but very unhappy that it
needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0
version?Cheers!Reginald
SwitchBL8's
gebazel
___
Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.
(Jim - I meant to send this to the list the first time around not
direct to you, oops.)
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for
On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Anthony Tarlano wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:49:10 -0800, Jim Hugunin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice
that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of the
Jim,
Sorry I didn't get my vote in before you close the ballot.. But I do
what to register my vote for ipython
Btw, that's what I have named the console already and it is natural
for me to continue to type python with just a leading i Give it a
try, I think you may like it..
Anthony
On T
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
There were a few more of you in favor of fepy than ironpy for that
science geek charm; however, I didn't not
23 matches
Mail list logo
