Re: [USRP-users] n310 offset tuning seems broken

2018-09-25 Thread Nate Temple via USRP-users
Hi Bob, What USRP / DB are you using? Regards, Nate Temple On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Tillson, Bob (US) via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Running 3.13.0.0 on Windows. > > > > I have a flag in my app to enable/disable offset tuning. > > > > Application works properly

Re: [USRP-users] max usable SPP on the E310

2018-09-25 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
OK, perfect, thanks Jonathon. I think I should be fine with 512, I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't doing something crazy (I couldn't find this limitation documented anywhere, but I am sure it is). - Original Message - Subject: Re: [USRP-users] max usable SPP on the

Re: [USRP-users] max usable SPP on the E310

2018-09-25 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hey Jason, Yes 512 is the max SPP, due to the 4k max DMA transfer size. To support larger FFTs, you could modify the FFT noc block to split up the frames between multiple packets and issue an EOB on the last packet. I have tried that in the past and had some success. Jonathon On Tue, Sep 25,

Re: [USRP-users] general RFNoC timing question

2018-09-25 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hey Jason, In regards to your original post, I wonder if the issue is due to the split stream block. Perhaps it has a bubble state and cannot keep up at full rate. Have you tried moving the Keep One in N before the split stream? Jonathon On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:07 PM Jason Matusiak via

Re: [USRP-users] Can't find a block controller for key FFT, using default block controller!

2018-09-25 Thread EJ Kreinar via USRP-users
In place of some repo with a git edit, I've copied the relevant changes from git format-patch below (not sure if it will apply cleanly to the current codebase, but the intent should be clear). As you can see it's pretty much a one-liner that just removes the "print" part of the UHD_SAFE_CALL. ---

Re: [USRP-users] general RFNoC timing question

2018-09-25 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
OK, now I am really confused. Part of my math issue seems to be that I set the "sample rate" in the RFNoC radio to be my sample_rate because I knew I could ignore due to the lack of DDC (it would then be set to the master clock rate). When I run my flowgraph, I see that the master clock rate

Re: [USRP-users] Can't find a block controller for key FFT, using default block controller!

2018-09-25 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I wouldn't mind seeing your solution to #2 as well. The messages certainly make things look more ominous than they actually are. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Can't find a block controller for key FFT, using default block controller! From: "EJ Kreinar via

[USRP-users] max usable SPP on the E310

2018-09-25 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
Is the max usable SPP size on the E310 capped at 512? In my flowgraph, I have an RFNoC FFT block. I know that the SPP needs to be set to the size of the FFT to make things happy and using 512 seems to work fine. As soon as I step up to 1024 I see a lot of errors: RFNoC Streamer block

Re: [USRP-users] DMA FIFO Resizing

2018-09-25 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/24/2018 02:52 PM, Brian Padalino via USRP-users wrote: I noticed that the dma_fifo_block_ctrl.hpp file isn't included in the installation of UHD as of current master: https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/6af6ac32c30d2dc0efa6eab61e4a3920649e3e62/host/include/uhd/rfnoc/CMakeLists.txt