Ian,
Thank you so much for taking the time to write such a detailed answer. And
thanks everyone who pitched in too. It's clear now.
Best regards,
Leo.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:22 PM Ian Buckley wrote:
> Leo,
> Ethernet does not fragment IP packets. There is a 1:1 relationship between
>
On 08/01/2018 02:24 PM, Leandro Echevarría via USRP-users wrote:
Hey everybody,
I'll somehow repeat a question I asked here a couple of months ago, to
see again if I can get some guiding. Hope you understand:
The CHDR packet length field in the CHDR header is 16 bits (i.e. 65536
bytes
Hello Nick,
That's the spirit of my question: why couldn't you break up a CHDR packet
over multiple Ethernet frames? I understand it is common for Ethernet to
break up an IP packet (which would also have a 16-bits field for packet
size in its header) into fragments, but limiting the size of the
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:59 PM Nick Foster via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> That's the MTU of your network interface limiting the CHDR packet size.
> Can't break up CHDR packets over multiple network packets.
>
Is the last statement that CHDR can't break over multiple
That's the MTU of your network interface limiting the CHDR packet size.
Can't break up CHDR packets over multiple network packets.
Nick
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:25 AM Leandro Echevarría via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I'll somehow repeat a question I
Hey everybody,
I'll somehow repeat a question I asked here a couple of months ago, to see
again if I can get some guiding. Hope you understand:
The CHDR packet length field in the CHDR header is 16 bits (i.e. 65536
bytes theoretical max length), but by doing Wireshark captures and playing
with
