[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 02/05/2023 16:44, Brian Padalino wrote: You can get around the RFNoC DUC issue yourself by writing your own interpolation block - or your own modulation block - and output at 200 Msps the exact samples you want to transmit.  Beyond that, it just seems like some assumptions that Ettus/UHD

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Brian Padalino
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:25 PM wrote: > Try interpolating on the host to 200 Msps and see how things go. > > I’m not sure what you are suggesting. If I take the “bad” recorded file > and I interpolate from 25 to 200 Msps, it’s not going to make chopped tail > the appropriate width. > > I also

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 02/05/2023 14:15, Brian Padalino wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:04 PM wrote: What is the sample rate of your transmitted samples? If it isn't 200 Msps for the X310, then you are using the DUC. I use a couple different sample rates. The plots I showed earlier

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Brian Padalino
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:04 PM wrote: > What is the sample rate of your transmitted samples? If it isn't 200 Msps > for the X310, then you are using the DUC. > > I use a couple different sample rates. The plots I showed earlier were > taken at 25 MSPs. > Try interpolating on the host to 200

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread ri28856
> What is the sample rate of your transmitted samples?  If it isn't 200 Msps \ > for the X310, then you are using the DUC. I use a couple different sample rates. The plots I showed earlier were taken at 25 MSPs. > Not adding 0's to the end of a burst which you intend to be interpolated is \ >

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Brian Padalino
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM wrote: > Are you using any interpolation or is it going directly to the TX DAC? > > I’m using a base UHD FPGA image at the moment. I tune the frequency > directly using the analog LO. The DSP component of the tune request is set > to 0. Is there some other setting

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread ri28856
> Are you using any interpolation or is it going directly to the TX DAC? I’m using a base UHD FPGA image at the moment. I tune the frequency directly using the analog LO. The DSP component of the tune request is set to 0. Is there some other setting that may have triggered the DUC?

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread ri28856
I accidentally attached the “fixed” plot twice. Attached is the trimmed sample plot. ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] Re: Tail of every transmit trimmed

2023-05-02 Thread Brian Padalino
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:01 PM wrote: > Hello, > > I have a C++ application I developed using x310s running on RHEL9 and UHD > 4.2 currently. I’ve noticed recently that the final ~25 samples of every > transmit are heavily distorted or nonexistent. I am able to replicate this > behavior using a