Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-11-08 Thread Ian Buckley via USRP-users
; Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 2:49 PM > To: Mark Koenig <mailto:mark.koe...@iubelttechnologies.com>> > Cc: Nate Temple mailto:nate.tem...@ettus.com>>, > "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>" > mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-11-07 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
: Neel Pandeya Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 2:49 PM To: Mark Koenig Cc: Nate Temple , "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" Subject: Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue Hello Mark: We do not have any document listing the changes between the hardware revisions of the UBX

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-26 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
, 2017 at 2:49 PM To: Mark Koenig Cc: Nate Temple , "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" Subject: Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue Hello Mark: We do not have any document listing the changes between the hardware revisions of the UBX, but they do not fundamentally affect the

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-26 Thread Neel Pandeya via USRP-users
October 19, 2017 at 12:30 PM > *To: *Nate Temple > > *Cc: *"usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" > *Subject: *Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue > > > > Nate, > > > > There seems to be a number of differences between the UBX-40 v1, UBX-40 v2 >

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-26 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
Hi Nate, just following up on this. Thank you Mark From: Mark Koenig Date: Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 12:30 PM To: Nate Temple Cc: "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" Subject: Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue Nate, There seems to be a number of differences betwe

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-19 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
Mark From: Nate Temple Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM To: Mark Koenig Cc: "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" Subject: Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue Hi Mark, The UBX v2 is not supported using UHD 3.9.3. Support for the UBX v2 was added with UHD 3.9

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-18 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
Nate, I upgraded to UHD 003.009.007, and it worked in CentOS7.2. I can now probe the daughtercard and get a return. Thank you so much! Mark From: Nate Temple Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM To: Mark Koenig Cc: "usrp-users@lists.ettus.com" Subject: Re: [USRP-users] UB

Re: [USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-17 Thread Nate Temple via USRP-users
Hi Mark, The UBX v2 is not supported using UHD 3.9.3. Support for the UBX v2 was added with UHD 3.9.5 and UHD 3.10.2.0. Can you please try updating to the newest UHD, such as 3.9.7 or 3.10.2.0 and try probing USRP/DBs again? Regards, Nate Temple On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Mark Koenig via U

[USRP-users] UBX-160 with X310 communication issue

2017-10-17 Thread Mark Koenig via USRP-users
Hello, I am looking for some help with respect to the UBX-160. I have two version 2 daughtercards which were purchased a couple of months ago. I am running on CentOS 7.2 and CentOS 6.5 with GNU radio version 3.7.4 and UHD version 003.009.003. I can ping the USRP and also return information on