On 03/08/2017 19:12, Ian Buckley wrote:
> Paolo,
> Thats a fundamental H/W limitation of the current FPGA design. Long
> story short, it would have been inefficient to support an MTU slightly
> larger than a 2^N size. It’s also a pretty conservative number in
> terms of a an MTU that works for
Paolo,
Thats a fundamental H/W limitation of the current FPGA design. Long story
short, it would have been inefficient to support an MTU slightly larger than a
2^N size. It’s also a pretty conservative number in terms of a an MTU that
works for 99% of Hosts and network gear.
-Ian
> On Aug 3,
Hello to all the mailing list.
I'm playing around with my X310, as far as I can understand the maximum
ethernet frame size supported by this device is 8000.
(in fact in x300_impl.hpp there is this constant static const size_t
X300_10GE_DATA_FRAME_MAX_SIZE = 8000;).
Because I'm curious I made an
