x86_64-cs failed in x86

2008-07-24 Thread Wenji Huang
Hi, The test case x86_64-cs will fail in utrace-patched kernel(2.6.26/x86), also vanilla kernel. [tests]$ ./x86_64-cs ./x86_64-cs: WIFSTOPPED - WSTOPSIG = 4 x86_64-cs: x86_64-cs.c:160: main: Assertion `0' failed. Aborted Related piece of the testcase: # ifdef __i386__ /* Resuming with

Re: x86_64-cs failed in x86

2008-07-24 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hi, On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:38:16 +0200, Wenji Huang wrote: [tests]$ ./x86_64-cs ./x86_64-cs: WIFSTOPPED - WSTOPSIG = 4 x86_64-cs: x86_64-cs.c:160: main: Assertion `0' failed. Thanks, committed (and also that unexpected values are a PASS now - a problem would be just a kernel crash).

Re: crash-suspend.c using new interface

2008-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
To test out the new utrace interface (I was using kernel 2.6.26-138.fc10.x86_64), I ported the crash-suspend.c example from the old interface to the new interface. It is attached to this email. Thanks, David. I'd been meaning to get around to updating that example. I'll take a stab at

Re: BUG at kernel/utrace.c:1638!

2008-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
I also reproduced likely same error as David in simple PTRACE test. That does not look related to David's crash at all. I will look into your case. Thanks, Roland

客戶的每ㄧ件小事情,都是山 鉧的大事情                     6969851b-f5f4- 486b-825a-3266a6695904

2008-07-24 Thread 平樑 韋
2008/07/25 - 06:49:31 山鉧科技網頁設計 我們的宗旨:客戶的每ㄧ件小事情,都是山鉧的大事情 我們在推出企業形象網站包含前台網頁美工+後台管理程式 ~~ PS: 線上購物網站我們還可提供刷卡機制,   與線上列印帳單全省超商+郵局繳費..等金流服務機制 ~~ http://twsam.zz.tc/ 限時限量專案價 只要$29,900 (在送ㄧ年100MB不限流量網站空間) 我們做的不只是網站,而是您企業的入口 ㄧ個好的企業網站資料即時更新的速度是很重要的

Re: BUG at kernel/utrace.c:1638!

2008-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
Fixed in the latest code. Thanks, Roland

crash-suspend is back!

2008-07-24 Thread Roland McGrath
I fixed the bug David found and also implemented UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD, which I had forgotten about. I then updated crash-suspend.c to work in the new interface, and it's even a bit less kludgey than the old one. Now it works! (You'll need the very latest utrace patch.) Note that recent Fedora gdb