On 8/8/07, Gary Thornock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One recommendation, if you do go with Subversion: *WHATEVER* you
> do, stay far away from the BDB-based repositories. Use FSFS
> instead.
I'll have to second that. The only problem I ever had with subversion
was a BDB corrupting itself. FSFS
--- Phillip Hellewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have an experience of moving from cvs to subversion
> at their work? If so, I would be curious to hear how it went,
> and if the overall result was positive.
I was involved in a development group a few years ago that moved,
by Comm
On 8/8/07, Joshua Draper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not moved from cvs to subversion, but I have set up cvs and
> subversion. In my experience, subversion is a royal pain in the neck
> to setup repositories. On the other hand, it is a breeze with CVS.
> After they are installed, they pr
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:13:58AM -0600, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
>
> Does anyone have an experience of moving from cvs to subversion at their
> work? If so, I would be curious to hear how it went, and if the overall
> result was positive.
>
I did the conversion of the CS system admin's CVS re
I have not moved from cvs to subversion, but I have set up cvs and
subversion. In my experience, subversion is a royal pain in the neck
to setup repositories. On the other hand, it is a breeze with CVS.
After they are installed, they pretty much work the same way. The
only major advant
Does anyone have an experience of moving from cvs to subversion at their
work? If so, I would be curious to hear how it went, and if the overall
result was positive.
Thanks,
Phillip
--
Phillip Hellewell
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in
