On 2014/10/24 11:48:02, rmcilroy wrote:
On 2014/10/24 11:18:57, ulan wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> If I understand correctly, this flushes all flushable code including
active
> code. This could lead to recompile/flush cycles and could actually
increase
> memory usage because of fragmentation in code
Nice, it's always nice when a 2 year old CL comes back :). LGTM, but please
wait for Ulan since I don't know the code you are touching in heap-inl.h
very
well.
https://codereview.chromium.org/677043002/diff/1/src/heap/mark-compact.cc
File src/heap/mark-compact.cc (right):
https://codereview
On 2014/10/24 11:18:57, ulan wrote:
Hi Erik,
If I understand correctly, this flushes all flushable code including
active
code. This could lead to recompile/flush cycles and could actually
increase
memory usage because of fragmentation in code space.
Would this not happen currently for an
Hi Erik,
If I understand correctly, this flushes all flushable code including active
code. This could lead to recompile/flush cycles and could actually increase
memory usage because of fragmentation in code space.
Is there open bug for this? (or a way to measure improvement)
https://codereview.
This is a revival of https://codereview.chromium.org/10933124/ from 2 years
ago.
https://codereview.chromium.org/677043002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
v8-dev@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8
