Re: [v8-users] Accessing block scoped variables via the V8 API

Thanks everyone. That makes sense, since these variables are "block scoped", so having them available outside the scope wouldn't work. Cheers, Ian On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 00:08:27 UTC-7, Ben Noordhuis wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Ian Bull > wrote: > > Can we

Re: [v8-users] Re: Have the no snapshot startup times gotten significantly longer in the last 6-12 months? 3s => 20s+

Yes, just to confirm: Starting without snapshot, especially in Debug mode, has become much slower, because more work is being done there (mostly compilation of builtins and bytecode handlers). This is working as intended. I.e. it's not considered a bug/problem, will not be improved over time, in

Re: [v8-users] Re: Interceptors running under "with"

from the docs: http://v8.paulfryzel.com/docs/master/namespacev8.html#ac135beae5f0c8b290255accb438f990e Returns a non-empty handle if the interceptor intercepts the request so make sure you are returning an empty handle for properties your object shouldn't respond to. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at

Re: [v8-users] Re: Interceptors running under "with"

I just implemented all the callbacks, and I see that for "with" there are calls to QueryProperty, which are not present in the no-with scenario. Maybe I can take it from there. Thanks for the idea! On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 9:05:11 AM UTC+3, Zac Hansen wrote: > > I don't know for sure, but if

Re: [v8-users] ICU problem

you can tell the linker to not care about order.. but presumably it's faster if you put them in the right order to begin with. On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 5:47:12 AM UTC-7, Nicolò Cavalleri wrote: > > Actually the problem was that I forgot to use circular dependencies, as > it's almost the

Re: [v8-users] debugging protocol

do you have it working if you connect with chrome then refresh chrome that it works? When I reconnect to the same embedded v8 app, I get a slightly different set of messages that don't properly set up the debugger the second time. Thanks. On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 9:32:15 AM UTC-7,

Re: [v8-users] Re: Interceptors running under "with"

I don't know for sure, but if you don't tell the interceptor that a isn't a property on CONS, then it thinks it is and then it finds cons_object.a but then you don't have a value for it, so it returns undefined. Have you fully implemented all 5 of the callbacks for setnamedpropertyhandler? maybe

[v8-users] Re: Interceptors running under "with"

Yes, I use SetNamedPropertyHandler. However, I'd like to make the following distinction: If I am *not* inside "using", the handler for "a" should return v8::Undefined (or some other preset value). If I *am* inside "using", the handler should not return anything at all, and let V8 determine the