Why not do it sh(1) style? (continue 2, break 2).
I would say that the perl style is a lot clearer about what happens.
If you have a lot of loops inside one another, it needs some figuring
out which loops happens to be number 2 at any given point.
--
Arto Karppinen
-
* Arto Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a lot of loops inside one another, it needs some figuring
> out which loops happens to be number 2 at any given point.
I bet the compiler already stores references to the current, but also
the parent scope.
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTE
Ed Schouten wrote:
* Arto Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have a lot of loops inside one another, it needs some figuring
out which loops happens to be number 2 at any given point.
I bet the compiler already stores references to the current, but also
the parent scope.
I was thin
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:20 +0300, Arto Karppinen wrote:
> >
> > Why not do it sh(1) style? (continue 2, break 2).
> >
>
> I would say that the perl style is a lot clearer about what happens.
>
> If you have a lot of loops inside one another, it needs some figuring
> out which loops happens to
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 02:20 -0300, Matías De la Puente wrote:
> hello all,
>
> i try to initialize a simple matrix:
>
> int[,] matrix = new int[,] { {1, 3}, {4, 8} };
We don't support initializers for multi-dimensional arrays right now,
however, we certainly want to support it in future versions
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 02:28 -0300, Matías De la Puente wrote:
> vala, will include operators overload like in c#?
We're not planning to support operator or method overloading, however,
we might add limited support to implement operators by the use of
special interfaces, similar to how it already w
* Jürg Billeter wrote, On 02/07/08 13:59:
> On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 02:28 -0300, Matías De la Puente wrote:
>
>> vala, will include operators overload like in c#?
>>
>
> We're not planning to support operator or method overloading,
are there non-technical reasons for avoiding method overload
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 14:08 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Jürg Billeter wrote, On 02/07/08 13:59:
> > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 02:28 -0300, Matías De la Puente wrote:
> >
> > > vala, will include operators overload like in c#?
> > >
> >
> > We're not planning to support operator or method
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 15:01 +0200, Frederik wrote:
> Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:09 +0200, Frederik wrote:
> >> I think in the GIO vapi bindings there are more parameters that should
> >> be marked as nullable. For example: "etag" as in File.replace() or
> >> "progress_callbac
* Jürg Billeter wrote, On 02/07/08 14:19:
>
> There are many cases where method overloading makes code harder to read,
> as each method can do something completely different, and you have to
> look carefully at each argument type to recognize what exact method will
> be called. This is especially b
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 15:01 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Jürg Billeter wrote, On 02/07/08 14:19:
> >
> > There are many cases where method overloading makes code harder to read,
> > as each method can do something completely different, and you have to
> > look carefully at each argument type to
2008/6/30 Dov Grobgeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A small syntax enhancement borrowed from Perl that I would like to see in
> vala is labeled loops, that can be referenced in continue and break
> statements. Here is an example:
>
>
> pixels:
> while(foo) {
> for (int i=0; i<1000; i++) {
> i
12 matches
Mail list logo
