Hi,
I think I found a bug (see the text at the end). Where can I report this?
Thanks,
Craig
someone@someone-desktop:~/temp$ cat test.vala
public class HelloT {
public delegate void HelloFunc(T t);
public HelloFunc _hello = (t) = {};
}
someone@someone-desktop:~/temp$ valac -c test.vala
Hello,
Why are strings not compared by value when they're passed into template
functions? Consider this gist:
https://gist.github.com/weberc2/4131654ff068d27f9cde
Is there anything I can do to get value comparison back in templates?
Please advise.
Thanks,
Craig
I don't understand what you're trying to do... You already have access to a
Class2 via Class1.getClass2(). Do you want some sort of fancy syntactic
sugar, so you can do something like `Class2 class2 = new Class1();` instead
of `Class2 class2 = new Class1().getClass2()`?
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at
Not exactly sure what you mean, but a very common pattern is one unit test
file for each class (unit) you want to test. This has worked fine for me in
every language I've worked with.
On Nov 17, 2014 4:07 PM, rastersoft ras...@rastersoft.com wrote:
Hi all:
I'm working on adding unitary test
Personally, I don't see why we need a system that works for every instance.
Let's build something that works for 99% of cases and the 1% can use cmake
or autotools. Also, there are other languages that bind to C and C++
without convoluted build systems. It's a solved problem. :)
On May 16, 2014
Yeah, I also wanted to use bake but I couldn't find any documentation
On May 16, 2014 12:03 PM, Steven Oliver oliver.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd never heard of bake either till now.
The only reference I could find to any kind of documentation was here:
package?
Thank you in advance,
Craig
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
to
be manually pointed to glib-2.0.
At any rate, this works for me now.
Thanks everyone for your time.
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hello,
Could you paste the output of the following command :
$ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0
Regards, Tarnyko
Craig writes
Alternatively, if you want the string literal to look presentable and you
know it will l not have tabs, you can strip said tabs from the string. But
generally Mario's suggestion is preferred, I think.
On Jun 10, 2013 8:04 AM, Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra
desideran...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Use:
