Hi,
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 18:25 +0100, Abderrahim Kitouni wrote:
Hello,
في ث، 14-12-2010 عند 16:06 + ، كتب Raul Gutierrez Segales:
Hi,
I am trying to understand how do the attributes glib:type-name and
glib:get-type affect the way vapigen treats a record.
if glib:get
Hi,
the following test program (which for me looks correct) generates bad C
code (treats void as an actual assignable type):
/*
* valac --pkg gio-2.0 ./test.vala
*/
using GLib;
[DBus (name = com.meego.libsocialweb.ItemView)]
public interface ItemView : GLib.DBusProxy {
public abstract
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 19:20 +1300, banjo wrote:
hi all
Ive been working on a vala app that requires complex data,
and found RDF was close to what i need.
I was pondering Redland and Rasqal but they seem overkill
for what i want.
This app is purely local and doesn't need
Hi,
Why is it that one *doesn't* have to use override when implementing a
property declared on an interface? I.e.:
interface Animal
{
public abstract GenericArraystring names_of_bones { get; set; }
}
class Dog : Object, Animal
{
public GenericArraystring names_of_bones { get; set; }
}
Hi,
I am trying to understand how do the attributes glib:type-name and
glib:get-type affect the way vapigen treats a record. I am running
vapigen on a gir that has
record name=MyRecord glib:type-name=PrefixMyRecord
glib:get-type=prefix_my_record_get_type
union name=myunion c:type=myunion ..