On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 12:52 +0200, Juerg Billeter wrote:
> On Sat, March 22, 2008 20:06, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
> > 1:
> >
> > If I want a copy of Gtk.TreePath I have to use weak but the problem is
> > howto free it after use?
>
> That's a bug in the bindings, copy should obviously not return a
On Sat, March 22, 2008 20:06, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
> 1:
>
> If I want a copy of Gtk.TreePath I have to use weak but the problem is
> howto free it after use?
That's a bug in the bindings, copy should obviously not return a weak
reference.
> 2:
>
> Another problem probadly a binding bug:
>
> w
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 19:23 +, Phil Housley wrote:
> On 22/03/2008, Mikael Hermansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1:
> >
> > If I want a copy of Gtk.TreePath I have to use weak but the problem
is
> > howto free it after use?
> >
> > TreePath a;
> > weak TreePath b;
> >
> > b=a.copy();
On 22/03/2008, Mikael Hermansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1:
>
> If I want a copy of Gtk.TreePath I have to use weak but the problem is
> howto free it after use?
>
> TreePath a;
> weak TreePath b;
>
> b=a.copy();
> b.[free/unref] <- does not work.
You should never have to free anything
1:
If I want a copy of Gtk.TreePath I have to use weak but the problem is
howto free it after use?
TreePath a;
weak TreePath b;
b=a.copy();
b.[free/unref] <- does not work.
2:
Another problem probadly a binding bug:
weak List selection = tw.get_selection().get_selected_rows();
Because of t
