Re: RSVP please: Re: Nestmates JVMS changes to selection and behavior implications

On 01/15/2018 10:43 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote: > EG members - could you possibly review this change and reply in an email? > We believe this is the last step to finalizing the nestmates JVMS changes. Seems OK to me. My only meta-thought is that nestmates might now hold the record for the most subtle

RSVP please: Re: Nestmates JVMS changes to selection and behavior implications

EG members - could you possibly review this change and reply in an email? We believe this is the last step to finalizing the nestmates JVMS changes. thanks, Karen p.s. changes are relative to: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlsmith/nestmates.html > On Jan 10, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:

Re: Nestmates JVMS changes to selection and behavior implications

David Holmes and I are good with Dan’s proposal here. thanks, Karen > On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> On Jan 3, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Karen Kinnear > > wrote: >> >> In studying the details of these changes, there are three sets of changes >> that

Re: Nestmates JVMS changes to selection and behavior implications

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote: > > In studying the details of these changes, there are three sets of changes > that change the behavior of invokeinterface. > Invokeinterface is allowed to resolve to a private member of the reference > class, and the resolved method becomes t

Re: Nestmates JVMS changes to selection and behavior implications

For the benefit of those on the observer list Karen sent an attachment which has been stripped. David On 21/12/2017 1:45 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote: David Holmes and I were studying the JVMS changes for nestmates - in particular the selection and preparation changes which are designed to make in