In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Theo Schlossnagle
writes:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-3071.diff
OK, I've picked the obvious stuff out.
Various questions about the rest:
Doesn't Solaris have fcntl(F_SETLK) as mandated by POSIX ?
flock() is not a standardized API, and I
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:30 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Theo
Schlossnagle
writes:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-3071.diff
OK, I've picked the obvious stuff out.
Various questions about the rest:
Doesn't Solaris have fcntl(F_SETLK)
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:30 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Theo
Schlossnagle
writes:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-3071.diff
OK, I've picked the obvious stuff out.
Next pass:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Theo Schlossnagle
writes:
Next pass:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-3080.diff
You still have the err.h compat stuff, that's not necessary any more,
I removed the two uses of err().
Why is the tcp.c patch necessay ?
You have not answered
Sorry for the comment at the end of my prevous email, got your
emails in reverse order here :-)
Doesn't Solaris have fcntl(F_SETLK) as mandated by POSIX ?
Ah, good catch. That wasn't a patch for Solaris. It was for Linux.
We've run into some issues with flock being more reliable than
Next pass:
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-3080-2.diff
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
You still have the err.h compat stuff, that's not necessary any more,
I removed the two uses of err().
Didn't catch that. Fixed.
Why is the tcp.c patch
